Welcome to Failtown

Many things to update around here--been away a bit--but I'll let Mr. 6199 do the heavy work dealing with Whoretown's latest bollox--he says it all and says it well. ;-)

WQ2RX stalker central bites the dust

Additional[Dec 1, 2009]: there seems to be a bit of traffic from a sad creepy blog. This link may help new readers keep things in context:

click link for your information

Additional ends.



I've held off saying anything--it might have been a temporary glitch or a bug. But it appears what people are saying is true--WQ2RX stalker central--AKA Killtown's forum 911movement.org-- has bit the dust.

Check yourself:

http://s7.invisionfree.com/911movement

No harm linking to a dead site.

What others on the Interwebs say:

http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/2463674/

http://z15.invisionfree.com/911taboo/index.php?s=618d6a99d50f40fa209e5431e6901c13&showtopic=1248

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?s=693648d98a87608a22bf4e1524983c66&t=86063

Theories vary from the webmaster leaving to Invisionfree pulling it after one too many Terms of Use violations. My guess would be the latter--these people never quit of their own accord.

Mind, there are a couple of places vying to be the next "go to" site for harassment and disruption among internet 9/11 activists. If they're smart, they'll take this as a caution: all the psychos--and people working with the psychos-- thought Whoretown was untouchable.

He's not.
Neither was his forum.
Neither is anyone elses.

Food for thought for those who know they're screwing with people.

And one should always observe the proper forms of ettiquette on these solemn occasions:

One source of 9/11spam and what to do about it

Mark this fact--I have never published any email address online in connection to 911truth. Not even the new one. It does not come up in Google search.


See? Never published, never crawled. So how the fuck did these people get it?





The only people I know who have it are:

1-Friends in 911truth--all of whom know better than to sign me up for list without my knowledge.

2-WQ2RX stalkers--among them the charming lass Jennifer Wynhausen, who uses various email addresses for harassment.

3-From an email sent to various activists including three Larouchites(Webster Tarpley, Bruce Marshall and Craig Hill, assisted byJim Fetzer, Kevin Barrett) --as a result of good faith efforts to try to resolve the Kennebunkport bollox.


Removing the first group from the list of suspects--friends and associates in 911truth--I must come to the conclusion Griffin and Elinoff have email lists culled from internet stalkers and Larouchite disruptors in 911 truth.

Maybe Elinoff and Griffin don't know that's where the lists came from, but that's not my problem. No, I'm not going to email them to ask to be taken off the list--that will just give them more information they don't have a right to.

We all know from the post Kennebunkport online harassment campaign that information from private lists was released about people without their consent. This habit may have finally backfired in real life.But let's see what some websites say about private mailing lists and what the owners of those lists are allowed to do with the information:

http://www.ipsh.net/website/liability.html

The content of messages sent to addresses from a third party list must be consistent with the disclosure made to the recipients upon initial provision of the email address or phone number. As a list owner, you are fully responsible for any third party's adherence to our policies for lists which you obtain and use in our system. Any violation of our policies by third parties will be seen as violations by you, and will subject your account to disciplinary action, termination, and fees accordingly.

http://www.shamash.org/help/aup.shtml

Any distribution of e-mail addresses of Shamash mailing list subscribers, list owners, or account holders, for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, is prohibited.

http://drupal.meetup.com/terms/

4.4 Restriction on Use of Your Information. Except as otherwise provided in our privacy policy, we will not sell, rent or otherwise disclose any of your Personally Identifiable Information (as defined in our privacy policy) about you (including your email address) to any third party.

But what about private Yahoo! lists?

http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/utos-173.html

"Publicly accessible" areas of the Yahoo! Services are those areas of the Yahoo! network of properties that are intended by Yahoo! to be available to the general public. By way of example, publicly accessible areas of the Yahoo! Services would include Yahoo! Message Boards and portions of Yahoo! Groups and Flickr that are open to both members and visitors. However, publicly accessible areas of the Yahoo! Services would not include portions of Yahoo! Groups that are limited to members, Yahoo! services intended for private communication such as Yahoo! Mail or Yahoo! Messenger, or areas off of the Yahoo! network of properties such as portions of World Wide Web sites that are accessible via hypertext or other links but are not hosted or served by Yahoo!.

And particularly for those who think Yahoo! groups are a free for all--not so much:

http://groups.yahoo.com/local/guidelines.html

You cannot re-post or re-transmit content that belongs to another user without that user's permission. A Groups owner or moderator (or any other user) cannot re-post or re-transmit Groups content to any other site unless the person has the explicit permission of every group member whose content is being re-posted or re-transmitted.

Hmm--so, at casual glance, most sites pretty much agree passing out people's email addresses --among other things--without consent, is not okay. Using those addresses to "volunteer" them for newletters they don't know about is in fact the definition of SPAM:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_spam

Which can be legal provided:

Spam is legally permissible according to the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 provided it follows certain criteria: a truthful subject line, no false information in the technical headers or sender address, and other minor requirements. If the spam fails to comply with any of these requirements it is illegal. Aggravated or accelerated penalties apply if the spammer harvested the email addresses using methods described earlier.

Those methods are:

Spammers collect e-mail addresses from chatrooms, websites, customer lists, newsgroups, and viruses which harvest users' address books, and are sold to other spammers.

But lets be real--neither Elinoff or Griffin used viruses to get my email--they got it from the same sacks of shite making a career out of harassing 911activists and survivors. And they may have violated their Internet providers terms of use:

Sending spam violates the Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) of almost all Internet Service Providers.

Hope you're reading Mr. Griffin and Mr. Elinoff. However you got my email, I can guarantee it came from a WQ2RX stalker list without my consent. And was passed around--with many others no doubt-- to spread general annoyance. No, it did not come from a Loose Change mailing list(as someone suggested)--because I've never been on that list. And even if it had, the proper way to do these things is to send out ONE announcement introducing yourself and INVITING people to sign up. Not taking a list of email addresses and running with it. I'd like to assume this is all just an honest cockup. But the history of email harassment and spam in 911truth idicates otherwise.

The first I ever heard about Core of Corruption:

Core of Corruption

Tuesday, February 3, 2009 8:50 AM
From:"CoreOfCorruption@gmail.com
"col_jennysparks@xxxx

Welcome.

This is an automatic response to a subscription request started at Core of Corruption.

Thanks for subscribing.

This project that has been exclusively worked on for over 5 years will involve the release of 5 films, all of which will detail a complete and comprehensive case of corruption and conspiracy with video news clips. Most of these clips are not available on the internet and have not been seen since they aired.

The series is going to cover a complete and comprehensive case about the biggest conspiracy in the world and the evidence that proves it exists. It connects Kennedy, Iran Contra, Watergate, Drug Running, 9/11 and even the current economic crisis we’re in today with all the same figures and a central theme of how they did it will also be shown. Never before seen video evidence and news clips have been surfaced for this groundbreaking event.

http://www.CoreOfCorruption.com

Tell everyone about this. email, blog, embed and anything you see fit. Contact everyone about this and do what you can to help make this big.

And another on the 11th of February:



Other people appeared to have complained. At the bottom of a later email:

If you feel you've received this email in error of to unsubscribe to this newsletter, go to http://coreofcorruption.com/index.php, enter your email address in the "email" box, check the "Unsubscribe" box, and click Submit.

Here's the problem: according to CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 :

Unsubscribe compliance

• A visible and operable unsubscribe mechanism is present in all emails.

• Consumer opt-out requests are honored within 10 days.
• Opt-out lists also known as suppression lists are only used for compliance purposes.

A visible and operable unsubscribe mechanism is a link in the email you click to unsubscribe(anyone part of a Yahoo! group can see these at the bottom of messages), not an invitation to visit a dodgy site and its possible malware. In my case this person obtained the email under questionable circumstances--it'll be a cold day in hell before I visit their site without a proxy. If anyone is in a similar situation, and there is no link to unsubscribe--just block the sods. "In error" my arse.

You can also report them to http://www.usdoj.gov/spam.htm .

May not do more than make you feel better, but there will be a record if they stir up more trouble. Oh--and their internet service providers. In my case that is, respectively:

Elinoff
Info@CoreOfCorruption.com
CoreOfCorruption@xxx:

1-COSENTRY.NET, LLC

2- http://www.qwest.com/corporate/customerService/contactus/

Griffin
davraygrif@xxxx:

http://ww2.cox.com/aboutus/contact-us.cox


Honestly, the amount of spam from these lads has been relatively tame. But that has not always been the case with 9/11 spam and God knows when and if someone wants to turn the clock back. What makes this concerning is the information used to subscribe me without consent is directly traced to the WQ2RX stalking shite. It comes from no other source. And the question is how will these email addresses--already obtained without consent--be used in the future? Will they pop up in more Internet stalkers masterpeices with eveyone baffled as to "how that happened"? Not if I can help it.

They all need to stop.

Stop sharing people's email without consent.
Stop sending unsolicited emails.
Stop subscribing people without their knowledge.

Don't be clever. Don't see what angel can be worked. Don't spin.

Just. Stop.




If anyone fancies a chat with either Mr. Griffin or Mr. Elinoff about their business practices, hoping to "reach them", good luck with that.

Truth Actions on September 11--around the world

For more visit Truth Action:

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5838

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5823

Click on tag for previous blog/links.

Kevin Barrett invites me to Facebook?

...for some ungodly reason. The first invite he sent was June 1st. Got another one yesterday:


Hope this isn't the first wave of a new 9/11 anniversary harassment campaign a la the post Kennebunkport Hoax's WQ2RX bollox:

http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2008/05/attacks-on-truthmove-return-of-wq2rx.html


Besides, wasn't Kev fired in 2008?

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=15031#15031

Which I blogged about?

http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2008/04/its-official-kev-youre-fired.html

So why is Kev trying to stir the pot by "inviting me" to Facebook as if I'm someone who'd be interested in having anything to do with him? BTW, IMHO Facebook seems to be another waste of time disguised as "social networking". Sorry, Facebook fans--maybe I'll change my mind in time, but that's what it looks like from here so far. Observe--current time I'm wasting typing about it--and I'm not even on Facebook.

Kev has also sent me unwanted email in the past--which I blocked. Then he decided it was a bright idea to send me more email--from a different address--which was also blocked. That and a legion of dodgy activities eventually led to this:

http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/02/lying-with-dogs-at-waterloo.html

Suppose I shouldn't be too surprised Kev's unclear on email harassment-- the girlfriend of a man he interviewed is equally confused by the concept:

http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2008/04/911-stalker-update-its-not-nico-but-he.html

Do people know Kevin was involved with the blatant stalker site wheretheylive.org?


reading in part:

WHERETHEYLIVE.ORG is founded in the spirit of Thoreau, Gandhi, King, Abdul-Ghaffar Khan, and the many other heroes of principled nonviolent resistance. It will publicize the home addresses of those who are alleged to have seriously abused their power over others, for the purpose of facilitating legal, NONVIOLENT demonstrations on public property outside those home addresses, in accordance with the people’s right to petition for redress of grievances as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States of America, international law, and principles of universal justice.

Nowhere is it made clear if these people who are alleged to have done something wrong are private citizens or public servants.

See, the big problem with this site is, since public figures already have and approve of their personal information being available(as per definition of public figure), the only people Wheretheylive.org could be talking about are private persons. That would mean they are asking for help to stalk private people. And matches, in intent, some bizarre reports of Killtown's girlfriend bragging about taking people around to where she thought I lived about the same time as the WQ2RX harassment campaign. Wheretheylive.org was likely a project set up to harass activists but, under bad press, was scrapped in favor of the anonymous WQ2RX stalking campaign.

Who owns the domain for wheretheylive.org? None other than--you guessed it--Kevin Barrett.


So, no I will not be Kev's Facebook "fwiend". I am not friends with domestic abusers and people who help Larouchites and internet stalkers.

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=22476#22476


Kev, the answer is "No". "No" means "no". No , nyet, non, nein.

NO.

Does he really want me to keep reminding people why?

Ranke self-promotion via Melissa Data front website

See previously re Melissa Data...here.



The question of responsibility for CIT spoke's man Craig Ranke may have been answered. It appears the public corporation Melissa Data Inc is aware of and supportive of Ranke's online CIT activities.

An anonymous article dated Aug 30 was published on New-n-Views, an online journal based in Rancho Santa Margarita , CA.



http://www.news-n-views.com/asp/articlenews.asp?place=0659587&issue_date=8/30/2009&edent=2167894&art_id=2560

(Sorry, no page rank for Ranke. Proxy strongly advised to visit this "news" site)

This article praises and plugs CIT, of course never mentioning their calls for people to virtual stalk their "enemies" in their Face-to-Name thread or their attempts to white wash the actual circumstances. To read this article you'd never think CIT or Ranke were recording witnesses without permission or republishing some of Killtown's internet stalking material. The comments include "Judy Jetson" plugs:

Comment by steve collier	8/29/2009
Here is a dvd of dr judy wood's evidence...please get a copy its very important http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/911-DR-JUDY-WOOD-EXPOSES-9-11-DIRECTED-ENERGY-COVER-UP_W0QQitemZ230368211069QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_CDsDVDs_DVDs_DVDs_GL?hash=item35a303f07d&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14

Comment by steve collier	8/29/2009
Aso please look at dr judy wood's evidence regards the dustification of the twin towers ...see her website www.drjudywood.com

Not too surprising with others dropping links to Killtown and related material:

Comment by Mike Selene

8/29/2009

@lefty, was there really another explosion? From what I have read, the firefighters pulled down the wall. There are pics of a book open on a stand in the part of the building exposed by that, no fire damage. Only small holes after the impact, http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/6.jpg from http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/pentalawn.html I am surprised there is no huge copypaste from Scheuerman here yet, but maybe he was just assigned to the wtc 7 postings? Height of the plane at the site is a critical piece of knowledge. Why release black box recordings from a fly-over? To confuse the situation more, or was that a move by someone on the inside? These guys have also gone over the flight data, http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.

CLG 9/11 Exposition Zone http://www.legitgov.org/9_1_1_oddities.html Lori R. Price Managing Editor Citizens For Legitimate Government http://www.legitgov.org/

Hmm--is that how he got started? Well it's over for him now...


So who wrote the article praising CIT? It was Ranke himself--he published an exact duplicate with his byline at Op-Ed news dated August 27, 2009:

INDEPENDENT-INVESTIGATION-by-Craig-Ranke

That's three days before the New-n-Views, probably to give the impression they(News-n-Views) just picked it up on the net via some feed. Though it doesn't explain why the first comments in New-n-Views are dated Aug 29th, one day before the article's alleged publish date of Aug 30th:



Thing is, New-n-Views isn't much for 911 or anti war news. They're really more the local mini drama type--or so they appear:


With their oldest archives going back to March 2009, they appear to have no connection to Ranke or his employer--

--if one doesn't bother to hunt up their domain:


Or simply Google their contact number 1-800-247-0806 :



Thought they would have learned that lesson by now....

http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/08/cit-more-company-contacts-inspiriant.html

So, not only is New-N-Views on Melissa Data servers, but the domain was registered through Go Daddy by Melissa Data Corp. on June 16, 2009. Which begs the question of how this alleged new site could have news in its archives dated in March of this year:



News-n-Views appears to be a hoax news site, a type of astro-turf with the sole purpose of boosting the activities of one of Melissa Data's employees.

Is Melissa Data engaged in questionable business practices? Readers may want to inquire the the Better Business Bureau:

http://www.la.bbb.org/FAQ.aspx

If one has more tangible or relevant evidence, a complaint can be filed here:

http://www.la.bbb.org/ComplaintDetail.aspx?CompanyID=35001147

	Melissa Data Corporation
	22382 Avenida Empresa
	Rancho Santa Margarita , CA 92688
Contact:	Gary Van Roekel

Other fraudulent practices should be reported to this office:


Attorney General's Office California Department of Justice


In summary: Melissa Data Inc. created an entire news website, designed to appear unconnected to its public corporation. It's archives go back before the domain actually existed, suggesting a deliberate attempt to make the site look older than it's two months. Some articles are feeds from other sources, like this one:



http://www.ocregister.com/articles/lam-authorities-contact-2541833-year-old

But no feed can retroactively include articles dated before the site existed.




This article was written by Nicole Melissa --dated March 15, 2009-- 3 months before the domain registry. At the very least, it shows people were writing articles for a site that was only in the planing stages, implying New-n-Views is a project.

Maybe they do things different in California. Maybe it's a cock up of grand proportions with a complicated but honest explanation. But I doubt it. On the surface, New-n-Views appears to be an elaborate hoax created by Melissa Data Corp, to provide one "news" platform to plug the Citizen's Investigation Team. The logical assumption is that Melissa Data, as a public corporation, supports , endorses and is ultimately responsible for the research and actions of CIT, and by extension Craig Ranke.

If this is the case, I'd suggest Raymond F. Melissa get his arse in gear, stop pretending he's doesn't know what's going on and clean up CIT's act. (Also http://citwatch.blogspot.com/)

Then some of us don't have to write about it anymore.

Compliments to jimd3100 of 911blogger for the tip.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=4298.msg794337#msg794337


UPDATE: someone has noticed the dodgy dates and "fixed" them:

before:



after:


Interesting "bug" they've got...

Troy from West Virginia caught abusing children

It's a terrible thing to be right, so it is.

While back I wrote regarding malignant narcissists:

http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/01/heroes-evolution-through-disruption.html

Its important to note these people are sane. The proof? When confronted with real consequences, they will capitulate to a higher authority—the law, police, etc. That is how you know
a: they are not crazy and
b: they know exactly what they are doing.

And since many of them are ego invested in being good people, their capitulation will come with excuses like: “It was all a misunderstanding!”

To a certain extent they are genuinely out of control. The need to manipulate and bully to feel good drives them. They will never apologize and never admit they are wrong on their own.


This emotionally crippled package is of great use to the witting manager if used carefully. They are invested in the status quo. They are terrified of change. Because their empathy is stunted, they are capable of doing many things. Unfortunately, their use is limited by the fact the malignant narcissist is always burning bridges and eventually their past victims will meet up and no amount of dissembling or lies will hide them forever. They are also high maintenance. They must be handled firmly by debt, employment or some other obligation because they literally can't be trusted. If they’re exposed, this cuts both ways, because then the manager is stuck with them. This is IMO the most probable personality that is recruited, convinced, maybe even volunteers, for the worst of harassment.

And did we hit the jackpot of malignant narcissism where Troy is concerned:

http://www.dailymail.com/policebrfs/200908120411

Police Briefs

Wednesday August 12, 2009

Witness says Putnam dad carried small son across field by one ankle

by From staff reports

PUTNAM COUNTY, W.Va. -- A Putnam County man charged with abusing his sons at a public ballfield has been released on bond but has been ordered to have no contact with his children until the case is resolved.

Troy Palmer Sexton, 36, of Summit Ridge Road, Hurricane, is facing domestic battery charges after carrying his 6-year-old son across a field by one ankle and allowing the child's helmeted head to hit the ground "more than once," according to a criminal complaint filed in Putnam Magistrate Court.

Sexton was with his four children, including 6-year-old triplets, at the field behind Winfield Elementary on Aug. 6 when a witness saw him being rough with his children during football practice.

Winfield Patrolmen Al Mick and Patrolman Robert Flinn met Putnam Sheriff's Deputy Chad Weaver at the field and found Sexton's vehicle blocked by the vehicles of other parents.

Sexton was described by officers as standing 6 feet 3 inches tall and weighing about 275 pounds. Police said the man looked calm as they approached.

A witness told Mick she saw Sexton leave his seat, cross the field and lift one of his sons above his head and slam him to the ground.

Another witness told police the father had approached the coaching staff and told them his sons were disappointing to him, he was ashamed of their performance on the field and he was taking them home, the patrolman said.

Sexton then grabbed his other son from the bench, "pinched and twisted" his hip and lifted him off the ground by his ankle, Mick said he was told by a witness.

Sexton walked off the field as he carried his son upside down by the ankle, causing the child's helmeted head to hit the ground "more than once," the complaint said.

He then threw the boy over a chain link fence that surrounds the field and the boy landed hard on the ground.

"It took everybody there by surprise," Mick said of the spectators at the field that day.

"It took them a second to realize this is really happening, this is real."

Mick said witnesses told him that after they realized what was going on, several parents rushed onto the field to confront the man. The criminal complaint said an onlooker yelled, "You can't do that to a child!" They said Sexton responded, "Mind your own f-ing business!"

Police said the man tried to leave the field with his four children but was prevented by onlookers who had moved their vehicles to block him and prevent him from leaving.

When police arrived, Sexton was standing with the triplets - the two boys and a girl - and another daughter who appeared to be slightly older, Mick said. Bruising was visible on one boy's legs, the patrolman said.

"The children were still visibly upset, emotional, crying, obviously scared to death," Mick said.

The officer said Sexton admitted to treating his two sons in such a manner but said he did not see why everyone was making such a big deal about it.

Mick said he asked some of the mothers at the field to take the man's children away so they wouldn't see their father arrested and to ensure their safety.

"The mama bears took good care of them, got them something to eat and to drink," Mick said. "I'm very proud of the way the community came together to take care of those kids."

The man was arrested at the field without incident and charged with two counts of domestic battery, misdemeanors. He was released on $20,000 bond Friday.

The children are in the custody of their mother, who was at work when the incident occurred, at their Hurricane home. Mick said the father was ordered to have no contact with the children until the charges are resolved and he is living elsewhere.

Hopefully in a mangy bedsit.


This quote-- "Mind your own f-ing business!"--is the rally of abusers everywhere. See, they think they have a right to terrorize people who can't fight back.

It's not the first time Mr. Sexton has had problems:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/15819

I wonder if his fans Pat Curley and James Bennett of Screw Lucy will keep Troy posting privileges? I was banned a long time ago for demanding an apology from Pat and Jumbo for trtying to frame me over Killtwoofers--another debunker project gone awry. Surely they won't let a domestic abuser--because we all know this is not the first time for Troy--surely they won't let a man who threatens public safety continue to post in their comments?

But of course they will. They republish Killtown's material about people. They mocked the deaths of Theresa Duncan and Jeremy Blake. They have a friend who knows exactly who harassed Val McClatchey for years and haven't said boo. They've completely ignored the Killtown/Ozzytwat saga of stalking actor Mark Humphrey as the Harley Guy. And they had to be dragged kicking and screaming to cover the Kennebunkport Hoax. Pat and Jumbo couldn't be more transparent, hypocritical, evil slags if they tried. Even Nico Haupt will have nothing to do with some of the shite Pat and Jumbo trade in--and it's a sad state of affairs if one's standards are lower than Mr. Haupt's.


So of course Pat(or James) will manufacture an excuse to let Troy continue posting with the usuallal "we're not responsible for what people write here" bollox. They like working with liars, stalkers and abusers. Ample proof of it archived. And one day Mr. Curley and.Mr. Bennett will have to face the fact they aren't wonderful patriotic good people at all--instead they have enabled and encouraged abusers and stalkers and share responsibility for the damage those people have done. Use your brain, Pat--if Troy has no problem harassing adults, of course he's going to be a menace to people who can't fight back. What was Pat thinking, egging Troy on all these years?

This isn't the first time domestic abusers have been found connected to 911truth. One will be giving a presentation at the We Demand Transparency honeypot--er, "conference".


http://www.madison.com/wsj/topstories/305149

http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/08/demand-transparency-from-we-demand.html

Yes--Troy's just the latest in a long line of easily avoidable or manufactured "troubles" in 911truth. And now we know he's a menace everywhere. Watch out for the people making excuses to keep Troy around...

Complements to Cosmos for dailymail link:

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5746

UPDATE: More Troy coverage: http://www.bustedcoverage.com/?p=18545