Thursday, November 29, 2007

Now we break for an Important Message from Truthaction

Mind, this message is weeks old but seems to need to be repeated, so here goes:


#1 BACK TO THE BASICS

We are a movement seeking JUSTICE for the crimes of 9/11 and we have a very solid case.

#2 KEEP A CLEAN HOUSE

Taking out the disinfo trash!

#3 KEEP KICKING ASS

We are going to grow this movement like never before.

Now there seem to be some who don't like Number 2--or Number 3 for that matter. Well, listen up chums:

GET OVER IT

Or start helping--instead of whining that the message, or the medium, is getting old.

So to repeat:


#1 BACK TO THE BASICS

We are a movement seeking JUSTICE for the crimes of 9/11 and we have a very solid case.

#2 KEEP A CLEAN HOUSE

Taking out the disinfo trash!

#3 KEEP KICKING ASS

We are going to grow this movement like never before.

Lead, follow, or get out of the bloody way.




Now we return to our regularly scheduled disinfo kickings and other news.


Monday, November 26, 2007

Our Nico sticks to Stalking and reports Truthaction as a terrrorist site

Which is not on either, BTW.

After my boys beat his boss about the head about Nico's behavior, Nico's at it again, with his 911Stalker TV:





In Nico's own words--"the topic was not a regular gay bashing". And we'd agree, luv--it was a highly irregular gay bashing.

Which Nico, Screw Lucy and Ricky are never going to live down.

But I'll let my boys speak for themselves. I certainly wouldn't want to take credit for their work. Fact is Screw Lucy may have cooked their goose by calling "jenny sock" one time too many. While Apollo just shrugged it off, Midnighter is in a towering rage about being called "Jenny"--pissing Midnighter off is not the smartest of moves, sunshine...

But back to this lovely video--where our Nico thinks it's cute to report Truthaction.org as a terrorist site.

Now as entertaining as our Nico can be, that's just sick. There are people who take "terrorist" too bloody seriously, with not enough sense. Fortunately Nico shoots himself in his own foot by dragging in TV-fakery.

Meanwhile, in the background glare, we're treated to the distraction of a woman rubbing herself in alluring poses. Bloody hell, that isn't Paula Gloria is it?

After making a call to the NSA, Nico signs off : "Remember, planehuggers are pedophiles".

That's Nico-- all class.

Meanwhile, Nico's wife at Screw Loose Change finally starts to doubt Nico's info:

"I'm virtually positive that the claim that.. (Jenny Sparks )...is a transgendered person is nonsense."

Sorry Pat, but didn't you say, not so long ago, that Nico has never been wrong? And yes, I did edit your quote--I'm not sharing the liability when the 911activist you think I am--who might be transgendered for all I know-- finally notices and gets legal.

Eeejit.

UPDATE: Speaking of eegits--a couple of people were not clear that this phrase "After my boys beat his boss about the head about Nico's behavior" is a metaphorical beating. To the best of my knowledge Rick Siegel can still feel safe hiding in Spain--or Belgium for that matter.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Screw Loose Change contributor and amateur porn star Nico Haupt takes homophobic turn

And we all know what that usually signifies...no, not that Nico is gay(though it seems likely), rather, it's time for a long overdue:


Newsflash Update



Patrick Curley's new husband, Nico Haupt, known to many as ewing2001, out did himself in a recent video, courtesy of Paula Gloria's rabbithole central network:

(CAUTION: the following video contains material that may be offensive to some viewers)


911 Stalker TV



Apparently the aim is to stalk 911 activists by attempting to violate their privacy. Sadly however, as I have been telling both the no-planes and debunker crowds, Nico's "sources" leave much to be desired.

The show was basically a fiasco for Nico "TV fakery" Haupt, as one after the other, he failed to contact his targets, much less have a chance to harass and intimidate them.

Another failed aspect was the not so subtle mangling of Richard Gage's name--or as Nico repeated, "Gay--ge". Truly puerile, sophomoric, and frankly appalling for a man who has recently exchanged sacred vows with another man.

NOTE: We were not invited to the service, nor do we have absolute confirmation of the private wedding, but, considering Patrick Curley is the only person outside of the No planes crowd who believes a word Nico says without checking it first, and considering Patrick is a 9/11 debunker, the ONLY explanation that makes sense is they're in a heavily invested, committed, long term relationship-- like marriage.

In any event we eagerly await the fallout of Nico's performance. Will he be sleeping on the couch for the next two weeks whilst he gets back into Patrick's good books? Will Patrick's blog, Screw Loose Change, denounce his husbands behavior, and take a firm stand that homophobic commenters will not be tolerated at Screw Loose Chance, even if that commenter is a spouse of one of the owners?

But there was one bright spot near the end--in an attempt to raise rabbithole central ratings, Nico dropped his trousers and mooned his audience: 37:00. This final performance piece he dedicated to yours truely. Let me say for the record, that, whatever other shortcomings Nico Haupt has, his shapely, waxed bottom is quite an asset. I sent him a complementary email, but I doubt he wants to share it. Regardless, he should be careful not to further aggravate relations with his husband by fanning any flames of jealousy by publicly flirting with me.

How ever Nico's performance affects his standing in 9/11 Truth, we do see a lucrative future for Mr. Haupt in the specialty porn industry and have taken the liberty of forwarding this audition to the relevant agencies.

Monday, November 19, 2007

Captain May: Doesn't like the idea of activists organizing

Or at least his group members don't.

Had to send him an email after I saw the Portland Nuclear Inquest archives:


I owe you a cartoon for your help spreading this rubbish:

http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/barlet.jpg

So here goes:

The image “http://wickedjuan.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/authority14_01.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Now that the pleasantries are over, might I ask what exactly you and your group object to in my blog at 911 Blogger?

My blog is about how to effectively organize activists groups--whether for a new group or or one that has been around a while. True, I've taken a tongue in cheek, light hearted approach, but many people find it hard to learn new skills if they're overwhelmed by the dry, scholarly approach.

However, reading your group's public archives, your people don't seem to be talking about the blog I wrote--fact, they seem to be talking about some other blog that only exists in their imaginations:

From Russ Halberg:
Blogger entry by Jenny Sparks, vote DOWN
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/1749

" Known provocateur, Col. Jenny Sparks, has posted a lengthy and useless article on 911Blogger: Unincorporated associations—an 9/11 activists guide to effective organization--with sex appeal!

I don't recommend posting comments, since that will result in a quagmire. She has (paid?) time to waste writing nonsense to distract the 9/11 truth movement. A simple rating of "1" should bring her article down."

From Jacob G. Stansbury, Jr.:
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/1751

"Maybe I just haven't been watching closely, but it seems that more and more of these distractions are being produced and presented to us in the "headlines"."

From Patti Woodward:
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/1754

"Yes Russ, sparks is all over spreading bile and venom and it's best to ignore him. It's not worth our time really except for a good chuckle! Patti"

From
"jdchandler2002":
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/1770

" we must use constitutional means to change things or we are no better
than the people who are in power now."

From Theresa Mitchell:
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/1758

" new virus spreading at military installations, Oregon

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/11160702/Ad14_Recombinant.html

--T"

Granted the last two comments in that thread are nonsequiters--making one wonder why they were even posted in the "Blogger entry by Jenny Sparks, vote DOWN" thread; some things will forever remain mysteries.

In any event, these posts by your group have a bit of "the lady doth protest too much". Presumably you support these posts or they wouldn't be there. So could you share with us what exactly you have against activists learning the tools to organize effectively?

Be happy to know that, we would. And when you're done with that, could you please explain why you have called me mate Arabeque's blog a COINTELPRO blog? Both at your group ghosttroop:

http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/26352

"It's COINTELPRO, Mel- I didn't realize it when I first saw it. This person is another who doesn't have the guts to do something in their own name. "

and at your site:
http://www.spiritone.com/~pazuu/pow-mia/Ghost_Troop_Captain_Eric_H_May.htm

Got the screenshot, btw.

As a former intelligence officer, you do realize that the people first to "snitch jacket" are traditionally the more likely to be "cointelpro" suspects?

I truly am sorry if you have health problems, as I hear. But that's really no excuse for allowing people in your groups to attack people or for your members to "snitch-jacket" activists . You owe Arabesque an apology, among many.

Word to the wise: if you can't link to proof of someones bad behaviour--like I just did with your lot--don't blow your credibility out of the water with wild accusations.

And when you're done sorting out your group discipline, maybe you want to share with us what exactly in my blog about Unincorporated Associations that frightens your people.

Because that's just strange. Though I suppose no stranger than scaring people into believing Portland is going to be nuked on less than no evidence...

You're proabably wondering why I'm even writing, besides to exchange comics. One of my team thought it was pointless. But I don't--see I think you need to know the consequenses of unfounded attacks and snitch-jacketing. And that everyone needs to see proof you and your lot do it.

Then maybe you'll stop--that, or your cedibility will go down the bog forever.

Your choice, sunshine.

Be seeing you...
And we'll see if that injects any sense of responsibility into that lot. My hopes aren't high, but they have been seeing what's happened to their mates, so they may surprise us and actually behave.

Or delete all evidence of "snitch-jacketing" from their archives.

Guess we'll find out soon...

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Kevin Barrett--front and center, please.



We're overdue for a wee chat about your behavior, mate.

To be blunt, you're making 911 Truth look bad. Let's count the ways--in no particular order:

  1. sending journalists not so subtle threats implying they could face hanging one day: http://www.truthmove.org/forum/topic/603
  2. there is your site, MUJCA , which features
  3. a article by Leland Lehrman, who apparently not only supports the KW hoax, but thinks the Protocols of Zion are a historical document.
  4. this article links to Tarpley's cointelpro alert at actindependent.org, the very alert that was the final straw to getting Tarpley the sack from the 911Truth Movement, if you recall.
  5. Going on record in Fetzer's Op-ed article saying you'll take TV-fakery more seriously now.
  6. The Madison Conference, where you cheerfully worked with a group including the disinfo who's who of the Truth movement, including Judy "dustification" Woods(and no, we don't care what her other Internet handles may or may not be).
  7. singling out individual journalists and accusing them of mass murder and high treason.
  8. endorsing Captain May's psyop "nuke Portland" hysteria
  9. linking to this RENSE cartoon on your site--though you did remove that link--a month later( cheers, but it's still too little, too late)
  10. and finally, conducting yourself in such a calculated, boneheaded way you guarantee that Screw Loose Change gets loads of material, here, here and here
And that's the short list.

Why do you do it, Kev? If you're really part of 9/11 Truth you've got to know by now rabbiting carelessly about the Jews and the Holocaust only gives the opposition ammunition, right? Do you like being a professional 3-D straw man for the Screw Loosers? Because that's all you're doing these days--as far as 9/11 Truth is concerned, you're right dead useless.

So here's where you're at: you know what happened to Webster Tarpley. No one is above criticism. If I was in your boots, I would start behaving--as of NOW.

-No babbling about Jews/Holocaust or mixing it with 9/11 Truth
-No more interviews of members of the No-planes, TV-fakery crowd
-No more spreading unfounded hysteria about "imminent false flags"-ever
-No more threatening people with execution, unless you can make a court case against said individual for a specific crime, punishable by the death penalty. And if that's the case, go to the DA.
-And stop mixing Rense shite with 9/11 Truth

I'll even say "please". Just this once.

If you are sincerely one of us and just aren't a good communicator, then, for all of our sakes, stop reaching beyond your grasp. Because right now, you're hurting, not helping.

If you're not sincerely one of us--well, guess we'll be due for anothe, less pleasant chat, soon.

So BEHAVE.

Right--you can go now. Dismissed.

Friday, November 16, 2007

Who is CB Brooklyn? WHO CARES!?!

Additional[June 2, 2011]: If you have been directed to this blog by Craig Lazo, before you help spread his lies, you should be aware his facebook account was suspended after spreading lies about people. This could happen to you too, fyi.

Additional: there seems to be a bit of traffic from a sad creepy blog. This link may help new readers keep things in context:

click link for your information

Additional ends.


From Jenny's diary~

I hate to break it to all you No-planes, mini-nuke, DEW people, but no one cares about your wee staged theatrics.

That's right. STAGED.

We've already seen the melodramatic Nico/Ricky break-up--where for some reason Ricky continues to support Nico financially. Maybe that's alimony. Whatever. The point is, nothing REALLY changed afterwards. You lot are still pushing the same rubbish, still playing opposite the debunker team, still have less than zero cred within anyone, in or out of the 911 Truth movement.

So why do you do it? I think it's because reputable 9/11 Truth sites have finally chucked most of you lot out. I've said it before, deny these tossers a platform, they WILL wither and die. So now they've been reduced to shouting incoherent schoolyard challenges at nineeleven.uk.

They are literally in danger of becoming extinct.
Their five minutes of fame is about to be--blessedly-over.
Their entire raison d'etre--to poison the Internet with rubbish calculated to drive off new activists--if about to come to a sudden halt.
They are disnfo dinosaurs staring into the eye of the inevitable flaming comet roaring their way, with their names on it.

So what to do?

Well, nothing--there extinction is imminent. But they are doing their damnedest to make enough noise, drama, theatre to draw attention back to them and away from any real 911 activism. Trying to draw it out for as long as they can.

Well, have fun with that, "chums". As I've said before, no one cares what a bunch of no planes wankers say--about other activists, or themselves. And "less than no one" cares about your manufactured soap-operas. The only reason I'm even blogging it is so I can direct new activists to the phenomena if asked, without giving you more press than you deserve.

To every moderator, administrator, or owner of any 911 sites, forums or news wires: when you KNOW you have one of these nutters, have no mercy--just cut them off. Then watch them shrivel and die.

And good riddance.

Long live the REAL 9/11 Truth movment.

____________________________________________________________

UPDATE: Nico whine's at his blog here :

NewAge Gender Cultfreak Col. Sparks claims, "

Ricky continues to support Nico financially", which is a bold lie.

No dime went into the one hand or other.
Fact is that 911bloglines.com was registered and paid by Haupt himself.
This, after an email exchange where I gave him a chance to explain why 911Bloglines is registered in Ricky's name:



Granted, Nico may have sites under his own name now, but, the fact is, Rick has bankrolled his stuff in the past. Probably continues to do so--how else does Nico pay his bills? Not like he has a visible means of support.

Then, in a gut busting farcical move, Ricky runs to Nico's defense with this blog, where, in part, he's confuses me with the sockpuppet king, B. J. Edwards. (Needs to convince himself there's no "Authority" so he can sleep at night):

Poor Nico, maybe he understands now why I insisted he get his domain. In fact I threatened to buy it, in which case I would treat it like an asset and he would never afford it again. Nico had such a cool name, 911bloglines.com, and I pushed him hard to BUY IT FOR HIMSELF. He finally did. Nico is a friend and I am not going to stand there and own a domain, buy one for him, or anything where later I might be tempted to use it in some other way. It would be a setup for evil and I would not do it. You can’t afford the 8 bucks for the name you are a loser. I actually forced him to stand independent. I remember he told me that he never did that before and now I think he understands the importance of what I was doing. I never wanted a domain to be held for ransom over him. Like Floum and Burks did in 911truth(resource). Pathetic “Sparks” can’t figure a mindset like this. Kudos to Nico who now knows that if he holds his creations on his own they can’t later be co-opted. Perhaps he understands more what a friend really is?
Yeah, Ricky, you're a real paragon of virtue, you are. Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back...

And what did Nico have to say for himself? In an email, he invited me to a three-way with his new wife Pat.

Sorry, luv, maybe when you were 10 years younger, before the drugs took their toll. And if Pat looked a bit more like Johnny Depp, and less like, um, Pat. Call me shallow, but I only shag hot men. ;-)

I had no idea my blog about no one caring who CB Brooklyn is would upset the no-planers like this!

Okay, I had a bit of an idea...;-P

SECOND UPDATE: Killtown has gone completely off his nut--rabidly repeating Nico's hysterical, wild, and inaccurate guesses about my identity. Sadly for him, repeating something ad nauseum does not make it true--or we'd ALL be no-planers by now. ;-)

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Unincorportaed Associations:an activist's guide to effective organization--with sex appeal!

From newyorkny911truthorg old pages

Unincorporated Association Info

When looking to organize a volunteer or nonprofit group the first advice received is usually that the group should incorporate. This is not entirely necessary. There are many well known groups in the United States that maintain an unincorporated structure, including political action committees, trade unions, charities, trusts, social clubs and condominium associations. Remember, filing 501(c)(3) forms is an issue separate from how-to-organize and can be done by any legally recognized nonprofit entity, including sole proprietorships, LLCs or corporations.

The Unincorporated Association is not talked about much in the world of regulations that is attempting to engulf us in the post millennium.. .

Posted by Johnathan, May 31, 2007, 2:24pm

Unincorporated Associations

an activist's guide to effective organization

~with sex appeal!

From Jenny's diary~

Freedom of assembly is a first amendment right. We don't hear about it as much as speak, religon, and the press. And it's the one needed to make the others count. It's not just the "freedom" what's needed, it's the knowing how of doing it. But, there is a dearth of information about how to effectivly assemble, that is, organize, available to activists. It’s not rocket science. It’s not black magic. So why is it people have a hard time excersising this right effectively?

The history of politics, and how it’s taught, particularly in the States, doesn't help. One is left with an impression all effective activism requires is getting together with your pub mates, agreeing the King should go, then marching on the British—perhaps throwing a bit of tea in the water on the way. Then presto—independence—just like magic.

If we look at why this appears to work in history, we are looking at a time where people who know each other, lived close by, passing information by word of mouth among trusted kith and kin. Even glossing over many organizational details that have been lost to history, this IS what effective activism looks like-- in an agrarian, preindustrial society, made of small, close-knit communities.

We are not living in the 18th century. We live in an industrial bureauocratic cosmopolitan society of far-flung communities. Communication is not done primarily by word of mouth, nor is it primarily through blood relations and ties to blood relations. In fact, we may be living for the first time in human history where one’s politics is not automatically associated with who one is related to. The practical reason families had similar politics in the past was they shared similar ecomomic circumstances. This is not automatically true anymore. And this is why simply getting together with a group of like minded mates and hitting the streets will not change politics or policies in our current time and circumstances--without adapting our activist organization to the industrial, information-based, bureauocratic, modern society we live in.

There is the another problem in activism that keeps people back from starting their own groups—seeing organization as so complicated and hard to understand that it is best left to the experts—like rocket science. I’m going to guess most of these experts—lawyers, teachers and so forth-- who have taken up this burden, do so out of good intentions. Certainly there are cases where someone just has to get something started and sort out the details later or nothing will get done. But, when only a handful or less of people in a group understand how the group is organized, or how to fully take use it, it creates an apartheid activist situation where democracy cannot thrive.

And this ignorance can create a trap for the dedicated activist who doesn't realize they are simply missing some basic knowledge they could acquire: they will rationalize all sorts of rubbish to stay with nutters “for the cause”. Well, no more excuses for you, sunbeam—you’re about to learn the basics of unincorporated group organization.

It is not black magic. It is not rocket science. But, thanks to feeble social studies courses, it is considered “uncool”. Because this subject is expected to be dead dull, dishy models suitable for everyone’s persuasion will appear at regular intervals to keep your interest.

CAUTION: I am not a soliciter, attorney or barrister. This information if soley based on my personal reserach. In many cases the precise definition of an association varies from state to state, country to province, in addition to the variations in laws and fees. I strongly encourage everyone to check with your home or state office as to which definitions and laws apply to your specific circumstances where you live.

What is an Unincorporated Associassion?







Organized activists are sexy and fun!



An unincorporated association(also called an “association”, a “nonprofit association”, a “voluntary association” or a “union”) is:

"A group of individuals who voluntarily enter into an agreement to form a body (or organization) to accomplish a purpose.

Strictly speaking in many jurisdictions no formalities are necessary to start an association. In some jurisdictions, there is a minimum for the number of persons starting an association. Some jurisdictions require that the association register with the police or other official body to inform the public of the association's existence. This is not necessarily a tool of political control but much more a way of protecting the economy from fraud. In many such jurisdictions, only a registered association is a juristic person whose membership is not responsible for the financial acts of the association. Any group of persons may, of course, work as an association but in such case, the persons making a transaction in the name of the association are all responsible for it"



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_association

Also: http://aia.mahost.org/fund_nonprofit.html

As an activist you are specifically looking to form a Unincorportaed Non-profit Associaction.

From the Oregon nonprofit page:

http://www.tacs.org/qa/qa.asp?tpID=9#36

"An unincorporated association is defined as a group of people who come together for some purpose other than to do business.


The positive aspects of associations are:


  • There are no registration or reporting requirements to the Oregon Corporation Division or Dept. of Justice Charitable Activities Section

  • There is greater flexibility in how the organization is run

  • Change in membership doesn’t impact the existence of the organization

The negative aspects of associations are:

  • There is no protection for the members. Everyone involved is equally liable for debts and in the event of a suit

  • It is not possible to open a bank account using the federal ID# (EIN#)


Or, more simply:

Pluses:

-no registration requirements—just get together and go to it

-choose your organization to fit your needs

-members can come and go

Minuses:

-everyone is equally liable for everything the group does.

-the group cannot have a bank account in it’s own name


In spite of these drawbacks, the unincorporated association is probably the best fit for most activists. However, if the group grows beyond a certain point or wishes to acquire property, they may want to consider incorporation.

Why organize at all if we don't have to?







Oh, come on! Organizing will be a blast!





It's that liability thing again. There's a bit of misinformation from a vocal anti organization quarter who believes that if they avoid organizing they will avoid all legal liability. They are grossly mistaken. Under the law, if your group is not incorporated but can be proven to exist as a regular entity, by default, your ARE an unincorporated association—whether you like it or not. As such, each and every individual member can be held liable for the group’s activities. So organizing yourself properly is the BEST way to avoid unpleasant legal suits.

Some of that misinformation might be explained here:

From Illinois Non-profit law:

“While many nonprofit associations benefit from forming not-for-profit corporations, small, local, or labor organizations tend to prefer an unincorporated association format. Local musical, religious, or literary clubs, for example, may not have the financial or human resources to obtain and maintain nonprofit status. Not-for-profit corporate status, discussed below, tends to be advantageous to larger groups with activities and relationships external to the organization. Small charitable organizations, such as family trusts, do not seek public funds or otherwise deal with people or organizations outside of the association. These organizations would not benefit from nonprofit corporate status, and incorporation would add additional and unnecessary legal requirements and possible liability.”


Note things do vary state to state
. Or even within the same state. But, whilst the above article makes unincorporation sould like a safe bet for a small group to avoid liability, three paragraphs later, in the same article they say this:


“Historically, an unincorporated association was not liable for actions of its members because it was not a legal entity subject to suit. However, the trend in the law is to allow even unincorporated associations to sue and be sued…. Furthermore, individual members may be liable for acts of other members under the traditional law of agency. A member of a musical society who contracts for a group performance may, even unintentionally, hold the other members responsible for upholding the contract. In effect, members of associations act as agents for other association members. A manager of an association also has a fiduciary duty, that is, the association has placed the person in a position of trust and confidence. He or she is required to act in good faith and in the best interests of the association. Similarly, the law of estate planning and probate, tort law, property law, criminal law, or even state anti-discrimination law, may apply to an unincorporated association.”


This isn't just a defensive manuever--by having good organization and clear charters and rules, you also put you group in a good position if it becomes neccessary to pursue legal action on the group's behalf.

Getting organized






Let's get unincorporated!



Now for the organizing bit. Note, unlike incorporated nonprofits, the state does not tell you how to organize, but it would behoove one to organize in a way that at least covers some of the established bases:

“Just because an association takes a less formal approach to its formation does not mean that it should grow haphazardly. Members of unincorporated associations should be aware that without some formal planning, associations risk running afoul of the law. Early organization becomes particularly useful once an association starts to grow in membership and resources.”

Anyway, to start organizing your group on solid footing, draw up a charter or articles of association:

Articles of Association

Every association should have articles of association. Sometimes referred to as the charter or the constitution, the articles of association is the document containing a statement of the association's purpose and an outline of the procedures it will follow. Some states require an unincorporated association to file its articles of association with the secretary of state, the county clerk, or another state or local agency. The charter should be tailored to the particular organization, but most articles of association contain the following

  • Organizational purpose

  • Organizational structure

  • Qualifications for membership

  • Methods for appointing leaders

  • Internal procedural guidelines, such as frequency of meetings and authority for handling finances

  • Tax status


Expanding on these articles in detail might help:

-Organizational Purpose - what are your groups goals and what methods do they plan to use to achieve them

-Organizational Structure- will people all have about the same responsibilities? Will there be officers? A mediator? Good ideas can be found in this book “Democracy in Small Groups”at Amazon. It’s less important what organization you have, than the fact that you have it and know how it works.

-Qualifications for membership--who can join and what does it mean to be a member? And how can you be expelled? What is often lost in the noise is that an email list, or registry on the groups website does not have to automatically mean one is an active member of a group with full responsibilities and rights. In fact it’s very easy to register or get on a mailing list—membership should be reserved for active, regular participants in the groups activities and decision making.

-Methods of appointing leaders and/or officers--how leadership is gained—and lost. Again, how it’s done, is not as important as that it is done, consistently and fairly. Where leaders are needed—and an argument can be made that some groups won’t need them as such—there should be clear standards, in addition to how they are appointed, and clear circumstances under which leadership/officerships is lost.

-Internal procedure guidelines-the nuts and bolts: how often you meet, where, under what circumstance a vote is taken, disaplinary procedures, etc. These can not be glossed over, though, to begin with, common sense will probably suffice. But, as the group grows, or becomes more known, procedures are essential not only in moving projects along, but in having a fair and consitant way to resolve conflict, reguardless of it’s source.

-Tax status—probably not a big issue , but consult the office that handles business in you state to be sure. The group might also consider setting up a trust if it wants a bank account or to rent property. Otherwise all buiness dealing will have to be done in the names of individual members.

Who needs a charter, I can hear some say? Well, anyone who:

“...solicits funding from the public, borrows money, is subject to insurance laws, is in a regulated industry, or has tax liability, must have articles of association. Even if not required, however, every association can benefit from the clarity of purpose and procedure that comes from creating a charter.”

This covers most groups who organize any events worthwhile last I checked

Putting it all together






Ready, steady, --organize!

So you’ve got your mates and you’ve decided to organize your group. Get out with your paper or bootup the notebook and go to it:

1: Name your group, if you don't have one already

2: Draw up articles of association:

a:your goals and what methods you plan to use

b: what structure strikes your fanny? Majority rule? Consensus? Something else?

c :electing/appointing leaders how are you going to do it?

d: where, and how frequently are you going to meet? Meeting procedures, moderators, agendas, etc?

e: How will you sort out disagreement inside the group?

f:review your tax status and whether you want to appoint a trustee

3: IMPORTANT: for your country/ state/ province check in with the office that handles business incorporation and find out what, if any, requirements there for unincorporated nonprofits to register. Even if there are no requirements, the group may wish to do so anyway.

4: Put all in writing—thus begins the groups records.


Don’t expect this business to get done all at one meeting. If fact it would be surprising if, given everyone is learning as they go, if all this took any less than a month to hash out. But once hashed, even if your group decides to change some things later, you will know this organizing you thought was dead dull, is actually, very, um, rewarding! Time for another saucy pic, I think….

How does your current group measure up?









Measuring up? You look fine, you hot activist, you!



Those are the basics. Below are a list of states linked where they had information on unincorporated associations. Where the secretary of state has no specific info, there is a number, and I’d advise anyone to call to just conirfm the status of unincorporated associations in their state. As a final note, getting this information for people in the States has been dead hard—apparently Brits, Canuck, and Assuie activists have for more resources available on the Web than Yanks. A cynical person might think there’s a plot among corporate America to keep regular Yanks ignorant about how to effectively democratically organize outside of a business setting….

What to do with what you know now? First, examine your current group and see where it stands. This doesn’t have to be good or bad—just know what your group is. Is it incorporated or not? What is it’s organization? And does that work for you? If the answers aren’t obvious, ask someone who’s been there longer. They should be happy to clear things up, happy someone is taking an interest and happy to show you how you can be more involved, if that’s what you want.

If they’re cagy and suspicious, that’s a flag. At that point you can either ask specific questions or back away slowly and make no sudden moves. People who have power in highly dysfunctional groups do not want to discuss organization, prefer to obsficate group history and the details about how the group is structured. They can also get vindictive and nasty if the facts go against them. Another flag is no written records. If you get the stone wall treatment, smile and thank whomever for their time and get out. It will not get better. And if you find yourself under attack, a nicely worded cease and desist letter(not email) to the group member(s) responsible, with copies sent to interested individuals(landlords) explaining how they are all equally liable should be sufficient to deter further attacks—if not, it is evidence you pass on to the police or your solicitor.

It is also possible you’re with congenial people who just don’t know about these things—in which case feel free to share the gift of organized effectivness! Sharing sex appeal is optional.

_______________________________________________________________

Links by country and state:

ADDITIONAL NOTES: after hunting down every Secretary of the State link, I am even more convinced of an agenda to obsficate or hide the basic tools of organizing from the noncommercial public. Where it was available, I linked directly to info on unincorporated associations. Where that was not possible, I link to a buisness page with nonprofits. And where even that was doubtful, I linked to the contact infiomation, most of whom have phone numbers. I strongly encourage anyone else who's as irritated at this obstruction of democratic tools to call their office up(look for a nuimber under "corporation " or "business" division) and ask nicely: "Pardon, I can't seem to find any information on unincorporated nonprofit associations at your site -- could you please help?" Take back your tools of democracy, one irritated phone call at a time.

(In a few case no contact information was available. Sorry the UK, Canadian, and Australian info is so brief. Information in more readily available on line, and the states knackered me out.)



United Kingdom

Canada

Australia

Saturday, November 10, 2007

9/11 Truth UK Education Action--GAME OVER


Cheers to all of you who helped educating UK 9/11 Truth about Webster Tarpley, his history, his actions, and his allies during his tour:


http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/11/385261.html?c=on#c184128

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/11/385129.html
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/10/384232.html
http://bristol.indymedia.org/

And it didn't go unnoticed or without comment:
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=146546
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=95705#95705
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=94743#94743
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=94743#94743
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=96362#96362

(these link lists are just a sample--they are not comprehensive)


At least 10 people in all helped directly. Thanks to these efforts, UK 9/11 Truth is better educated and will have a better context with which to consider future events involving Webster Tarpley.

Cheers all!

________________________________________________________

Now a special message to 9/11 Cult Watch and their allies:

At truthaction this was called to our attention-

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8625#8625

I'll say it once and remember you were warned:

Don't even THINK about taking credit for truther actions in educating the UK public about Webster Tarpley.

Thursday, November 8, 2007

Pat Curley has a Bridezilla moment at Screw Loose



After I pointed out to him at 911Blogger he was ignoring our education efforts at Indy Media UK in favor of the Cult Watch wankers, he rushed back to his blog to type this, not realizing how parroting one of Tarpley's attacks on the Hoax Busters would look:

Update: In the comments on that post, Paul notes that several of London's big hitters were noticeably absent from Websterpalooza; I speculated that perhaps it was due to the Kennebunkport Bunk. Jenny over at 9-11 Blogger begs for a link to some stuff she's been posting over at the UK Indymedia site, but then plays coy when I ask for a URL, apparently believing as usual that I came across the 9-11 Cultwatch post by shadowing her every move. In fact, I came across the post virtue of Dylan Unsavory in our comments section. Whatsamatter, Jen? Chip Berlet not paying you enough to make my life easier?


First, he seems to be terminally dense to the fact I'm not acting alone, no matter how much I shove the fact into his--and others--faces:

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2519


Guess they're just obsessed with Jenny.

Second, I know Pat knew about our Indy UK actions because his fiancee blogged it here:

http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=4165

A whole series of articles have passed over the web pages of Indymedia.org.uk in recent days, suggesting that Webster Tarpley, who wrote that damning exposure of President Herbert Bush, has sold out.

The prime mover in these articles is someone called Colonel Jenny Sparks. She also seems particularly damning about Capt Eric May, who pulled noi punces with http://www.911blogger.com/node/11758, and who was one of the first to suggest that a nuclear device could have been used at Baghdad airport.

Jenny Sparks' original article is included below, for debate...

Mind they make the same mistake of focusing just on me and ignoring arabesque, and cosmos actions, among others...

By Pat 's own admission, he checks Nico's blog regularly for news:

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2007/02/nico-haupt-news.html

If you're wondering why I handle the real Nico so gently, it's because he's actually quite a bit more reasonable than many other 9-11 Deniers. He doesn't insult people here, he doesn't insult the firefighters or the passengers or their families or the pilots or Edna Cintron, or engage in Holocaust Denial. I can point out many, many instances of the more prominent, supposedly more mainstream 9-11 Deniers who cannot say the same. His news aggregator is one of my regular stops looking for bloggable content.

And I think he's dead on the money when he talks about the movement and the efforts by various cults to subvert it to their own ends.

You'd think, knowing "The Authority" has been riding Tarpley and knowing Nico has been regularly reporting our actions, that Pat, looking for Tarpley info, would at least check in with his fiance's blog once in the 2 days that passed between Nico's post and his...

Just like with the Kennebunkport Hoax we exposed, Pat knew we were on to Tarpley in the UK, but chose to ignore it--in preference to endorsing the Cultwatch wankers as the first responder.

Well, the jokes on him--even Cultwatch knows--and links to--Nico's blog---right above their link to Screw Loose Change, as chisc posted a screen shot of here:

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8545#8545

Things aren't looking too good for your side , Pat-- go back to your wedding plans, luv, and stop making an ass out of yourself.

Note: Pat does try to explain his Chip Berlet gaff as a joke in an update--but it shouldn't have even occurred to him to use a Tarpley attack if he's not part of a similar agenda. Not to worry--as usual in these circumstances (when Pat posts another clue he's not the pure debunker he claims to be), his mates will just ignore the blog in question for as long as they can and hope the embarrassment goes away...