Friday, March 28, 2008

An Open Letter to Indymedia

Someone has been bad. Apparently they're making posts on Indymedia claiming to be We Are Change UK with the intent of making We Are Change UK look like a bunch of paranoid nutters. We Are Change UK has set the record straight accordingly:


Dear Sir,
It has been brought to our attention that an anonymous user has been posting on your site claiming to be a representative of We Are Change UK.

The following posts are not by any member of our group:

We Are Change UK - 911 was an inside job!
We Are Change UK take part in the 11th or every month action that calls for a new investigation into the events of 9/11 and to stop the Illuminati agenda.
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=113095#113095&sid=87fe76736d9e7c3a53cded49d985b669
A
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/03/394741.html

We Are Change Exposes Secret Indymedia Agenda
Today Indymedia hides reports from the leaders of British activism, We Are Change.
We now now that Indymedia is controlled by Zionists and the Illuminatti.
This is enough proof:- Indymedia are protecting the culprits of 911, Freemasons and the Illuminatti.
WAKE UP! INDYMEDIA IS PART OF THE PROBLEM.
WAC
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/03/394763.html

We Are Change Banned From Zionist Indymedia
We Are Change, the leading activist group in the UK are banned from Indymedia for speaking the truth.
We Are Change are the most prominent and credible UK activist group this country has seen in years.
We Are Change aims to become mainstream activists with the Worlds media watching as a revolution is lead by We Are Change.
Zionists at Indymedia fear WAC.
We Are Change have the support of Alex Jones. Indymedia is afraid.
WAC
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/03/394761.html

We Are Change UK do not endorse trite phrases like “9/11 was an inside job”, neither have we any interest in any perceived “Illuminati”, “Freemason”, “Zionist” plots or conspiracy theories and certainly do not consider the Indymedia website to be anything but a reliable and reputable alternative news portal which we are happy to endorse.

We Are Change UK are a grassroots campaigning group who very much have our feet on the ground. While we do call for an independent inquiry into 9/11 and do not accept the official version of the events, we do not deal in conspiracy theories, or in laying blame on imaginary bogey men. Our aim is to bring awareness to all of the problems of our times which the Mainstream Media have neglected or turned a blind eye to.

We take a fact based approach to all of the issues we campaign against (amongst others):

Illegal aggressive wars ( Afghanistan , Iraq and any planned attack on Iran );
The refusal of an inquiry to the family members of the 7/7 bombing victims;
The lack of accountablility or real investigation into the deaths of Jean Charles de Menezes and Dr David Kelly;
ID Cards/ DNA Database/ RFID Passports;
CCTV;
Guantanamo Bay and any other prisons which break moral and international laws;
Extraordinary Rendition;
Slavery;
The siege on Gaza;
Use of depleted Uranium, white phosphorus and other barbaric weaponry;
The refusal of the US Authorities to answers the questions of the 9/11 victim’s family members;
The horrendous treatment of the first responders of 9/11 (see http://www.fealgoodfoundation.com);
Federalist European Union;
SOCPA law;
Threats to internet freedom;
“Anti-Terror” legislation which inhibits civil liberties.

The posts above are written in a tone which is a far cry from that which We Are Change UK endorses – a tone which has disturbing elements of anti-Semitism and support for violent revolution which We Are Change UK abhor.

We would like to thank Indymedia for deleting these fraudulent and offensive posts and wish all at Indymedia the best in their continuing effort to bring alternative, independent news and views to the masses.

Best regards,

We Are Change UK
We Are Change UK

This letter can be seen here:

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/03/394908.html

Or would be if Indymedia hadn't hidden it for some arcane reason. Which school of journalism advocates hiding corrections and clarifications? And I happen to know Indymedia has the means to track the IP's of posts if they really have to. This can be sorted.

So, We Are Change UK didn't make those posts, and they've written a very nice letter showing how sane they are. Can you please make that letter readable, Indymedia? Cheers.

UPDATE: According to a truthaction post the above letter was placed incorrectly--all moderation issues should properly go to Indymedia's email list, NOT be posted on their site.

Though personally I could make an argument someone running about posting rubbish in my name IS news, completely separate from moderation issues, and SHOULD be posted publicly.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

COINTELPRO REVISITED: An Exercise in DisInformation?

The following abridged article was written by Barbara Hartwell, a woman who claims to have been a former intelligence officer(where have we heard that before?) persecuted for telling all. Unlike Philip Agee, who could not set foot in the States for years after he went public, Ms. Hartwell seems to have no problem moving unhindered inside the US border. I apologize to Ms. Hartwell in advance if her story is true, but, considering the territory, we must consider that she is still "on the mole" and her articles about Co-intelpro are the products of very sophisticated disinformation about Co-intelpro tactics--that is 90% is solid and 10% is rubbish.

I have taken the liberty of heavily editing it and adding my comments, while leaving what may be good information intact. That's right, I'm cherry picking it to hell. Call it "disinformation vandalism". This way the ideas will get out for other researchers to follow up. Read the original here .

________________________________________________________

Part One: COINTELPRO

This report addresses several issues related to COINTELPRO-style operations.

COINTELPRO (counter intelligence program) was initiated in 1956 under FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. A similar program, Operation Chaos, was run by CIA during the Cold War Era.

Today, these programs continue, though under different names and operations, with various federal agencies involved in their web of deception, skullduggery, black propaganda and carefully-crafted disinformation. Their overarching agenda: Mainly to neutralize and/or discredit legitimate government whistleblowers .



CONNECTING THE NODES IN THE CRIMINAL WEB

But for those persistent and dedicated investigators and independent intelligence analysts, there are ways to beat the system; to unravel the web of corruption. Starting at the top is not an effective method. We start where we have easy access to verifiable information and where collecting evidence is only a matter of time, effort and investigative legwork. And we begin by focusing not on the higher levels of government operatives giving the orders, but on those tasked with carrying out the orders. Just as in the drug cartels, though it is already known who actually runs them, criminal investigators often start with the low-level street dealers, gathering evidence, and work their way up to the drug lords from there. It is often just a matter of connecting the nodes in the web and developing the evidence as the investigation progresses.

Now, it is important to understand the concept of "plausible deniability". Quite simply, this means that the conspirators and liars running the COINTELPRO-style operations set up a little insurance policy to protect themselves; a contingency plan in case their criminal operations are exposed. They can then DENY any involvement or wrongdoing which might implicate them in the conspiracy. How do they do this? One way is to use lowly minions to do their dirty work: those who have no official status within the government, from whom they can easily distance themselves if their plans go awry. The minions fallinto several categories by which they can be identified.

But most importantly, they are all considered expendable. They are expendable, because in the final analysis, in the Big Picture, they are deemed inconsequential nobodies by the powers-that-be.

COINTELPRO MINIONS: EXPENDABLE HIRELINGS

1) Criminals. Those convicted of a crime (or known to be involved in criminal activities) who wish to make a deal for a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free card by becoming snitches; and/or by targeting the former intelligence/law enforcement personnel or others who have become government whistleblowers.

2) Activists/Amateurs/ Wannabes. Members of political activist groups, or individual activists, many of whom are merely dupes, hoodwinked by the covert government operatives (who pose as patriots, especially organizers or "leaders") and are drawn into their web with (false) promises. The operatives often choose those who are ambitious amateurs; "wannabes" (those with no training, expertise or background in intelligence work, law enforcement or other disciplines) and appeal to their egos to give them a false sense of "importance" --when in reality they are merely stooges being used for a government-sponsored agenda.

3) Drug Abusers and Psychopaths. Some individuals from this third category may also fall into the first two. Psychopaths are particularly useful, as they can easily be dismissed by the government operatives as whackjobs, nutcases, kooks, lone nutters, etc. should they become a liability. These types are often easier to control --if they get out of line, they can simply be thrown into a mental ward with few questions asked. Now, this is not to say that the government operatives don't try to impugn the sanity of legitimate whistleblowers, in order to neutralize them --they most certainly do. But the difference is, some of those used as minions in the COINTELPRO are REAL nutcases and the operatives controlling them are well aware of that fact.

Most are also pathological liars who may be delusional; narcissistic and entertain paranoid fantasies, which are purposely fueled by the government operatives. Often the designated targets (whistleblowers) are falsely accused of various plots or crimes against the delusional/paranoid minions. The COINTELPPRO operatives feed them such false information in order to engender a personal vendetta against the targets. A vendetta which is based on falsehoods; twisting factual information to demonize the target; and often outright lies.

There also may be an element of hero worship --worship of the covert (and not so covert) government operatives by their dupes and minions. When one of the bad guy operatives is exposed by legitimate whistleblowers, the minions rally to his defense, attacking the targeted whistleblowers for what they claim are their "unjust" accusations or "lies."

Nothing could be further from the truth. The minions have been manipulated into promoting the very lies their controllers have fabricated, and continuing the cover-up of criminal activity, be it drugs-for-weapons deals; child sex abuse; money laundering; blackmail; espionage or any other forms of criminal conspiracy/racketeering.

The primary key to using these minions to target whistleblowers is manipulation, often through behavior modification tactics. Appeal to their emotions, by which they are ruled. Flatter their egos. Make them feel "important." Make them feel like real "players." Make them believe they are "doing the right thing"; going after the "bad guys" (legitimate whistleblowers); fool them into believing they are serving "Truth"and "Justice."

Meanwhile, it's all based on lies. Usually outrageous lies, demonizing the targets (legitimate whistleblowers) with the purpose of discrediting their testimony about REAL government crimes and corruption.

Facts; logical reasoning; critical analysis: these have no place in the COINTELPRO. It is based upon a web of falshood, spun by liars, inside a hall of smoke and mirrors.

COINTELPRO also exploits the "alternative media" to do their dirty work. Since the advent of the Internet as the major "news" venue, the level of professionalism in journalism has plummeted. These days, just about anyone can put up a blog and promote their opinions, write editorials and distribute them to be available to thousands, even millions of readers. The very same operatives who recruit the dupes and minions also rely on alternative media websites and radio programs to spread their disinformation far and wide.

PART TWO: TARGETED FOR NEUTRALIZATION

From the American Heritage Dictionary, excerpts of a 'non-scientific' definition of neutralization:

To counterbalance the effect of; make ineffective. A state of ineffectiveness, inaction or inoperativeness. To negate and nullify imply finality rather than a stalemate; they also imply loss incurred through the rendering of something [the targeted individual] useless or valueless.


PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS: ISOLATION, ALIENATION, DEPRIVATION

In such a campaign, the individual is targeted for Psychological Operations (PsyOps). Neutralizing an individual can be summed up rather well in three words: Isolation. Alienation. Deprivation. Just reflecting on the nature of each of these words helps in gleaning an understanding of the methodology of neutralization. I will elaborate with some specific examples.

The perpetrators will do all in their power to ensure that the target is alienated from family and friends who might otherwise have offered assistance and support. They may send provocateurs (outside agitators) to stir up trouble between the target and those people close to him/her, family, friends, associates, professional colleagues.

Classic Machiavellian divide-and-conquer tactics are used: forged letters and documents; false accusations and allegations; trumped-up criminal charges and false arrests; setups; and the like. The perpetrators are experts at engineering and manipulating circumstances which will work to the detriment of the target and thereby destabilize every aspect of his/her life.

To impugn the sanity of the target is another common tactic, with the intent that friends and family will not believe the horror stories of persecution and will instead believe the target to be mentally unbalanced or "paranoid". It is true that 'clinical' paranoia is a form of psychopathology; on the other hand, as those of us so targeted know all too well, the persecution is not 'imagined' (as a function of abberant psychology, such as delusions) but very real; it is life-destroying and often life-threatening in one way or another.

The perps will also run libel and slander campaigns. They will scandalize the target's good name, using character assassination and defamation to destroy the personal and professional reputation of the target so that s/he will be compromised; discredited; unable to find work; blacklisted from employment in areas of professional training and expertise; or be fired from any job s/he holds. Thus s/he is unable to earn a living and will be shunned and ostracized, treated as a pariah by peers and colleagues.

The perps also do their damnedest to drive the target into poverty, bankruptcy and financial destitution. Thus the target is deprived of many of the basic necessities of life; cannot pay the bills; may lose his/her home; may lose vehicles so s/he is left without basic transportation; and/or is forced into an exhausting struggle just for minimal day-by-day survival.

They may arrange automobile or other 'accidents' intended to seriously injure or kill the target. Should the target survive the attempts on his life, the individual is still likely to be isolated, alienated from family and friends, unable to find emotional support or material assistance. They also want the target disabled and/or suffering from chronic illness, which they may create with continuous or repeated exposure to electromagnetic radiation; attacks with directed-energy (so-called "non-lethal") weapons and/or by poisoning the target's environment with chemical/biological warfare. They may also administer drugs or poisons surreptitiously through the target's food and drink.

The perps may invade the target's home ('black bag jobs') committing acts of theft (often of documents); tampering with the target's property and/or installing surveillance bugs/phone taps.

They often engage in vandalism, destroying the target's property. Slashing or placing screws in the tires of the individual's vehicle is common, as is draining the oil, puncturing the radiator or cutting the brake lines.

Sabotage of computers is another tactic which can be done at the computer's location in the target's home or office; remotely through land lines; through electronic directed-energy devices or even by dedicated satellite.

TECHNOLOGY DESIGNED FOR SPYING, SABOTAGE AND TORTURE

[References to "exotic weaponry" and DEW excised--sorry, they do not need "space beams" to harass people when they can use the phone]

I should also mention that sleep deprivation is a standard (and very brutal) method of torture used against prisoners of war (and in this case prisoners of conscience) by tyrants and oppressors in the military and intelligence services world wide. Torture by sleep deprivation is nothing new, it's been used against targets for centuries. And it continues to this day in the United States of America.

POLITICAL PERSECUTION IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

[Text wanders here--point seems to be "they are very bad people and out to get you". We got that, thank you]

CRIME AND PUNISHMENT: A TWISTED PERSPECTIVE

[Text wanders--they're everywhere and are masters at manipulating the system. Again, we got that]

LACK OF UNDERSTANDING: IGNORANCE CAUSES SKEPTICISM

As I know from the comments I've heard over many years from my readers, the listening audiences from radio shows and attendees of my public lectures (and even at times from family and friends) there are those who will think such things don't really happen in the U.S. of A.....That the government would not be harassing and persecuting its own citizens! Perhaps, they say, this is just "paranoia" or "fear mongering". Most people simply will not believe it unless it happens to them --until they become the targets.

When I have spoken about the various attempts on my life, I have also heard people claim, in efforts to discredit my case, that "If the CIA wants a target dead, the target would be dead." Yes Sirree Bob, no two ways about it !... But these people don't know what they're talking about; it's not as simple, not as cut-and-dried as they may think. Maybe these folks have been reading too many spy thrillers or believe the simplistic concepts about CIA presented in Hollywood movies.

THE REAL WORLD OF INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS

In the real world of intelligence operations it doesn't work that way and situations are often not what they appear to be on the surface. In any case, those offering these erroneous speculations and uninformed opinions have no context from which to understand the complexities of these Psychological Operations nor the larger picture from which they emerge. But I find it unfortunate that their ignorance, which is often exacerbated by arrogance, aids and abets the perps by calling into further question the veracity of the targeted individual's testimony.

For one thing, "neutralizing" a target does not always mean the goal is to "eliminate" her by the final solution of death. Secondly, it's not just agents of CIA who are involved. Certain camps may have much to lose if a particular target is taken out. There may be retaliation against those who ordered the 'hit'.


CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER

Nonetheless, just the trauma of being subjected to such death threats is enough to cause severe and lasting damages.

And what about the consequences to your general health and well-being of such a torturous lifestyle? It used to be called "shell shock" or "combat fatigue". Now it's called Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and I have suffered from it for many years.

Finally, it's important to understand that the perpetrators know that there are things --such as long-term brutal, stressful, traumatic persecution-- that can actually be worse than death. And they are hell-bent on causing as many of a wide range of damages as possible --physical, material and emotional-- for anyone who is a serious high-profile target. There is also the consideration that if the target is assassinated, s/he could become a martyr and thus establish posthumous credibility for the allegations of persecution by the government. In some cases, that's the last thing they want, another martyr, especially if the individual is a high-profile target.

A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY? LIFE AS A HIGH PROFILE TARGET

I have often been asked: What is a high-profile target? And who becomes one? Succinctly put, a high-profile target is a person who is deemed a threat in one way or another to National Security.

There are several "requirements" to qualify as a high-profile target. The target must have been actually involved in a government operation about which s/he possess accurate information and direct knowledge; and/or have been a witness to covert activities on the part of government officials/agents/employees and/or their corporate cronies which are illegal and/or involve abuses of human rights, etc.

Not all high-profile targets are whistleblowers, former operatives of intelligence, like myself, or of law enforcement agencies, like ex-FBI agent Geral Sosbee. Sometimes investigative journalists or other investigators --who have not actually been involved or witnessed situations directly, who were never "insiders" but who have simply uncovered damaging or incriminating information-- become targets as well.

One example of a person who was targeted is a private investigator whom I asked to work on my case beginning in 1994, just after I broke out of the operations. After we collected evidence of phone taps and bugs, planted in my home (at that time, Milford, Connecticut) and office (located in Pine Bush, NY) by military intelligence, he was subjected to some of the most severe harassment and intimidation tactics I've ever seen.

The perps sent a SWAT team to break down Peter's door while his wife was home alone, claiming that the police received a 911 phone call that someone was about to "commit suicide." No such phone call was ever made, it was simply an intimidation tactic to warn him: Stay away from Barbara Hartwell.


These tactics are more dramatic than usual, but the perps certainly made their point. And as numerous witnesses could attest (most refuse to stand up as my witnesses, since they've been intimidated or turned against me) the people involved with me in any way are more likely than not to be subjected to the more extreme end of the spectrum, involving harassment with military hardware or tactics.

Often the high-profile target has already gone public or is perceived as someone likely to go public. If the individual has access to evidence of the crimes and corruption it raises the stakes, because generally speaking, they don't care so much about what you may know as about what you may be able to prove and what they believe you are going to do about it. In other words, how much damage can the target actually do to the perpetrators' agenda?

DEEMED A LIABILITY

For the most part, people will consider the targeted individual a liability, someone to walk far away from, as quickly as possible. The character played by Gene Hackman in the film Enemy of the State summed it up this way: You're a liability to your friends, your family, to everyone you know. The protagonist in that film, an ex-NSA agent, knew what it was like to be a target and was warning another man who also became a target after he stumbled unwittingly into a nest of NSA vipers intent on covering up a politcal assassination.

Though, like most Hollywood productions, that particular film was sensationalistic in depicting the most extreme forms of persecution against the targets, the basic premise was solid. The "enemy of the state" (target) always finds himself in a double-bind, from which there appears to be no way out.

Whatever the nature of the situation or the decision you need to make...damned if you do, damned if you don't. But this is only what the perps want the target to believe; to actually believe it and thus give up hope can be the death knell.

Unfortunately for the targeted individual, most associated persons' primary concern seems to be protecting themselves. And that's exactly the idea the perpetrators have in mind. Severing attatchments and associations important to the target by design so the target has nowhere to turn for help or solace, that is what they bank on.

It is easy to isolate a target for one or all of the following reasons: Most people are easily intimidated by the government goons and once they get a small taste, even of low-level harassment, they are afraid of becoming real targets themselves. They cannot fathom how dire the target's plight actually is. They are too self-centered to care about the target's dilemma --not enough anyway, to make any real difference. Not enough to stand by the targeted individual, no matter what. This usually translates into showing a lack of loyalty to the target or abandoning the target altogether.

PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILING OF TARGETS AND THEIR ASSOCIATES

It is also important to understand that the people running these ops have done extensive background checks and created psychological profiles on each individual who is targeted for neutralization, as well as on those associated with, closest to, or most important to the target. They keep databases, filled with dossiers on various individuals.

By analyzing the psyche of a target and of his/her associates, they attempt to predict the behavior of individuals, making it easier to foment suspicion and distrust, to orchestrate situations likely to break up families, marriages and other important personal and professional relationships. By evaluating what they perceive to be the "weaknesses" in each target's character/personality, they exploit them in any way possible. In the worst case scenario, if at all possible, they will arrange to pit the target against those closest to him/her, thus making enemies of friends, spouses or family members.

They will even make 'pre-emptive strikes' in order to keep certain individuals also deemed a "threat to National Security" (other targets) from ever meeting and/or having any involvement with the targeted individual, or to severely limit that involvement, as well as contact, if they have reason to believe that the two of them together could present a strong united front and be a more formidable "threat" to the perpetrators' agenda than just one of them alone.

Keeping such targets separated --as far away from each other as possible, including geographically-- is key to their strategy of total control. But this strategy can only work if one or both of the targets fall prey to the machinations of the perpetrators. Sadly, at least one usually does and the plot achieves its desired end.

The plots and setups spawned by the perps are at times so cleverly executed that I have seen --over and over-- one person after another who has deserted, betrayed or scapegoated me, in some cases totally unaware that they had been manipulated into doing so by third parties with their own agenda. I've also seen the same pattern operating in the cases of other targeted individuals that I have investigated or simply been a witness to.

Facing the horror of a neutralization campaign defies description, even for those fortunate enough to have real and reliable support from family, friends or a spouse (and there are some who do.) But having to face it completely alone has been nearly unbearable.


EXPUNGING LOYALTY, DESTROYING LOVE

The isolation and alienation are very effective tactics. They work.

Although it's true that I have been able to get occasional assistance, support and backup over the years, here and there, from time to time, from various individuals, it has always fallen into one or more of the following categories: temporary; inconsistent; short-lived; conditional; qualified by various circumstantial factors.

This is not to imply that I don't still have a few good friends, a few family members who care for me and have concern about my well-being. I do, and am very grateful for whatever degree of support they are able and willing to provide.

But in truth, there is no substitute for having even one 'true blue' person you know you can rely on, through thick and thin. Someone who shows absolute loyalty. This is precisely the type of support the perps have always done their damnedest to make sure I could never get. Not so far anyway, and this dreadful situation has been going on for a long, long time. I am very sorry to have to admit that their plot to keep me isolated --and to foment alienation in my relationships, especially with those who may have otherwise stepped forward to help me or stood by me rather than desert me-- has met with resounding success.

But their success can't be proved by me. I wasn't the deserter when people were counting on me. And I am well aware that I cannot blame the perps entirely for the lack of loyalty and reliability others have shown me, even those for whom I myself have shown loyalty, reliability and trustworthiness. It always hurts when such loyalty is not reciprocated, especially from those closest to you, from whom you might have at least such a reasonable expectation. Absolute loyalty: it must be a two-way street with no double standard. Black-and-white, cut-and-dried. Such loyalty is either there or it's not.


[Text wandering about God's love]

You may be wondering: What does any of this stuff about "love" have to do with neutralizing a target?

[Text continues to wander]


WITNESS PROTECTION?

I find it ironic that under "normal" circumstances, a person like myself might expect to get some relief if she were placed in WITSEC (Witness Protection Program). But in this case, it's the government operatives who are the criminals, persecuting a law-abiding citizen.



WHERE ARE THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES WHEN YOU NEED THEM ?

On some of the more mundane occasions of harassment, I've had to call the police, for such relatively minor crimes as trespassing; breaking-and-entering; theft; vandalism; phone harassment and stalking. The perps (at least those among them who are professionals) cover their tracks well; thus they are difficult for the police to apprehend.

[ various claims about the futility of police reports -- which I know from personal experience is bollox]

CLOSING COMMENTS

[Text becomes advertisement for Constitutionalists or Right leaning Libertarians--take your pick]

Barbara Hartwell

January 31, 2006

Join the Revolutionary Coalition

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition/

Defending our God-given (natural) unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed rights.


Monday, March 24, 2008

When "Leaders" Whine: Toxic Leadership and the "Pity Play"

Whatever we think about leaders we choose, whatever we expect out of them --or ourselves when we take on that role--"whining" is not it. By "whining" we don't mean pointing out flaws while working on a solution. By "whining" we mean, when confronted with a problem that needs attention, instead of taking it seriously, the alleged "leader" proceeds to invent all sorts of excuses to NOT address or even acknowledge the problem.

Annoying as this is in anyone, it is particularly maddening in an individual either tasked with greater responsibilities or who has taken on greater responsibilities. Why would someone do this? It literally makes no rational sense to acknowledge and accept a leadership role, then to do everything possible to avoid discharging those responsibilities. Why would someone behave like this, in some cases to the point of completely destroying their credibility?

The most charitable interpretation is, that in an authoritarian culture, there are so many dysfunctional role models of leadership, some people have just been mislead more than others. But those people will learn from their mistakes and, over time, improve. They will also be more open to timely constructive criticism.

But there is an intractable breed of "leader" who is impervious to all attempts at timely constructive criticism. Their tactics vary from "playing dumb", distraction, belligerence, and many behaviors one could arguably say anyone is prone to under sufficient stress. But when they give you the "pity-play" instead of responding to valid criticism, then you know you have a much worse problem than you thought.

The "pity play" is the signature mark of either a sociopath or a person acting in the interests of a sociopathic organization, say a multinational corporation as detailed in The Corporation. This dynamic is detailed in a book making the rounds called "The Sociopath Next Door". It is not just your average pissing and moaning. The "pity play" is very specifically used when a sociopath has been cornered and confronted about their actions, and, instead of either an explanation or an acknowledgment of responsibility, they try to distract by playing for sympathy. To distinguish this from the periodic self-centered narcissism we flawed humans are all prone to in times of stress, note--this is done instead of ANY acceptance of responsibility. The object of the "pity play" is to distract and hopefully allow the person to continue enjoying the rewards of the relationship without any change or effort on their part.

An extreme example would be an incestor, on being confronted and when it is clear the evidence is against them, INSTEAD of removing themselves temporarily from the picture to show good faith then trying to prove their innocence rationally(hiring a lawyer, etc), they interject how hurtful this is to them, even pleading for sympathy from the child. Sociopaths, because they do not have empathic feelings, are "tone deaf" as to why this makes them look ten times worse than they did.

A less dramatic example: an organizer has been caught and documented to repeatedly betray an organization's trust, say involving fraud. When confronted and it is clear the evidence is against them, they claim to be the target of a "hate campaign". It takes more than garden variety cluelessness to to be brazen enough to even attempt this kind of "gloss" if there is proof of dodgy paperwork. Being empathetically tone deaf the sociopath sees this as likely as anything else to work.

Unfortunately many of us have enabled these dynamics unwittingly, thinking them quirks or "one offs" or not important enough to challenge at the time. And then, when it gets serious, we find to our surprise we have a war on our hands.

Now before everyone goes running off to label every irresponsible and dishonest person in their life a sociopath, remember--this trait is not in isolation. It must accompany outrageous/unethical/irresponsible/and/or criminal behavior

AND

after the person suspected of the above behavior is confronted

INSTEAD OF

admitting any responsibility or that there is a serious issue at hand they pull the "pity play": "I'm hurt", "Don't you see I feel aweful?", "Why are you attacking people?"

Most of the people that have done you wrong are not sociopaths. There are plenty of other neurosis out there. But, of those troublemakers, the sociopath makes up a significantly higher percentage than other groups -- and mis categorizing them as "misunderstood" can have dire consequences. If you find an individual exhibiting these traits in a leadership role you cannot ignore it.This type of problem individual must be removed as soon as they are proven to be a problem because they will never improve--their goals are not your goals.

This is the hardest bit to understand. Most of us have made mistakes, and want to improve and can't imagine what it would be like to just not care what effect we have on people . It is hard to accept that some people either do not have empathy or are committed to some other agenda that effectively means they will act as if they had no empathy. Since we can't read minds, once their actions start to cause harm, we must treat them alike--that is, remove them as soon as you have reason to before they cause any more damage.

It is not easy. And once they have been removed, baring the threat of overwhelming force--arrest, a lawsuit, etc,--only half the battle is done. Because their driving force and only real joy is controlling other people(or they are committed to some unstated goal), if you successfully remove them, they will do their best to make your life hell. "Moving on" is not in their vocabulary. Neither is agreeing to disagree. Consistent applications of firm boundaries will keep most at bay: block their email addresses, ban them from your forums, do not engage them when they try to bait you or complain you won't "debate them". They are not interested in honest communication. They are interested in control. That's what they live for.

Prevention is the best medicine.

The best way to prevent this problem in leadership is by making your organization unattractive to the sociopathic would be leader. A democratic organization founded on clearly defined organizational structures and procedures, where leadership is either shared or, at the most, a manager and/or spokesperson( and then only when needed)--is a very unattractive property for a sociopath who wants to have power over people or wants to be the center of attention.

The fact of the matter is we have a high percentage of sociopathic behaviors represented in various former "leaders" of 911Truth. According to Martha Stout, as many as 4% of the US population exhibits these traits. Off the top of my head, I can think of at least 4 individuals still operating in and around 911 activists that definitely exhibit these traits and have shamelessly used the "pity play" when confronted. But if one were to expand their influence, and include their supporters, I think Ms Stout's 4% figure would be exceeded by quite a margin in 911 activist circles, my unscientific guess would be 10%(more if we include "debunkers"). Several explanations suggest themselves:

1: There are a higher percent of people with sociopathic tenancies are drawn to political movements. This is unlikely--sociopaths are found scattered throughout all areas and interests. But in unpopular movements under stress they may thrive more than elsewhere as the members have a higher than average need for acceptance and belonging, making them more vulnerable to a sociopath's manipulation.

2: Many of these individuals are part of an organization that requires them to behave in maddening contradictory ways. To my mind this is much more likely as we already have proof that organizations can and do demand crazy, unethical behavior out of otherwise sane people. (See again, The Corporation) We also have proof that there exist companies that literally hire "political mercenaries" who will say and do anything for a paycheck.

I'm not suggesting we replace "troll" or "shill" with "sociopath". The fact is we can't really know for certain. All we can do is note patterns of unacceptable behavior and be prepared to "pull the plug" when it is proven the pattern is pervasive and toxic. My point is to show where we are tempted to think we have a misunderstanding(because we are being empathic), when certain behaviors consistently happen together--misbehavior, refusal of responsibility, "the pity play"--it is not a misunderstanding. You are dealing with either a person or an agenda that is trying to assert toxic control over yourself or your forum.

Get ready to show them the door sooner or later--it's only a matter of time.

Final notes:

Remember, most sociopaths are not criminals or criminal masterminds. Like everyone else, they vary in interests, intelligence, talent and ambition. Some just want a free ride and will only do the absolute minimum to get by; if they can skive off a boyfriend/girlfriend, husband/wife so much the better. Others want much more control over their environment; they are the backstabbing cliches that work their way up the corporate ladder. Yes, some are criminals, but those are mostly the ones with limited resources--most sociopaths do not want anyone controlling them, particularly the authorities. As such they can be scrupulously law abiding--unless they are certain they won't get caught.

To complicate matters, certain anti depressant drugs can numb people to the point they report thinking they know what a sociopath must be like--they didn't care about anything or anyone when on medication. The fact they were bothered by this, even just intellectually, takes them out of the running, of course. The genuine sociopath has no feeling for anyone, not "friends", family or pets(they have no real friends--only people they want to control. Unfortunately the "friend" doesn't know this until it's too late). The sociopathic organization has no concern for anyone or anything that does not advance its goals.

To whom it may concern...

Don't you love these wee chats? I hope you get as much out of them as I do.

Well, the time has come for you to understand how bad it is--for you.

I tried to explain this to "Bevin Carrot", but poor dear, he's in denial. But you're brighter, aren't you, luv? That's why you're sitting in that cushy chair and not down among us mere mortals. I'll make it short and quick:

Do you know what a "ringer" is?

Have fun with that...

Friday, March 21, 2008

Truthaction Mission Statement

Ready or not, here it is:


Mission Statement

truthaction.org is dedicated to achieving justice for the crimes of 9/11. To this end our primary focus is promoting activism to raise awareness about the lies of the official 9/11 story and to push for an independent criminal investigation into those events.

It is our aim to grow the movement for truth on a global level through the promotion of International Days of Truth Action on the Eleventh Day of Every Month and to encourage and support everyday activism.

We aim to put an end to the global war on terror by exposing the truth about its foundational myth. 9/11 truth is the key to stopping the global war machine.

We aim to restore our rights and civil liberties and repeal all laws based on 9/11 propaganda.

The 9/11 Truth Movement is at the forefront of the global movements for justice and peace and we will continue to build bridges with our natural allies within these movements.

truthaction.org is a wholly peaceful organisation and we totally reject violence in activism.


Recommendations for 9/11 Truth Activism

Guiding Principles

We support the following:

1. A dedication to rational, dignified and nonviolent activism and debate motivated by compassion, justice and truth
2. Awareness of public perception and the need for a strategic and responsible promotion and presentation of our cause
3. A commitment to building credibility and encouraging constructive alliances with the peace movement and other natural allies
4. Adherence to the scientific method and journalistic standards with a focus on facts, substance, and sources
5. Continually reaching out to new people in new places and in new ways

Conversely, we will actively seek to counteract, minimize and withdraw from the following:

1. Motivations based on ego, hatred and personal agendas
2. Promotion of speculative and unsubstantiated claims
3. Disruptive, divisive, diversionary and irrational behavior
4. Damaging and marginalizing associations
5. Highly partisan representations of the movement and cults of personality
6. Ongoing debate on divisive issues (see section on divisive issues)

We will engage others in the movement to make them aware of our recommendations, developing constructive dialogue while raising awareness of them and the reasoning behind them, while being open to critique and revision. We will disengage from groups and persons that continue with destructive or divisive behavior.


Dealing with destructive and divisive behavior


1) Identify and critique behavior that is harmful to the movement (i.e. speculative theories without evidence and activists who engage in disruptive behavior, divisive incidents, etc). Challenge leaders who unreasonably continue to support and tolerate such damaging behavior.

2) Refuse to debate solidly debunked theories by simply referencing responsible websites, articles, and blogs which have already refuted such claims

3) Discourage unnecessary and unproductive antagonism (i.e. infighting, personal attacks, gossip, etc.) that wastes time and causes divisiveness.

4) Avoid the divisive labeling of individuals and groups.(i.e. shill, agent etc)

5) Be aware and vigilant concerning the presence of agent provocateurs within the movement. Do not engage in witch hunts or unsubstantiated accusations. Treat those who continually, and despite consultation, act in word and deed in the manner of agent provocateurs, as such. While these people can rarely be proven to be agents, they should be treated as counterproductive and untrustworthy. Such groups and individuals should not be engaged in unproductive ways, such as aggression, name-calling, personal attacks, etc. Instead, the substance of their destructive behavior should be detailed, after which they should be avoided when possible. If appropriate, exclusionary action (banning from forums or groups, removal of links from websites, cancellation of speaking engagements etc.) or in extreme cases legal action should be taken.

6) Do not allow the proliferation of irresponsible information or damaging behavior simply because the individuals or groups in question maintain a certain reputation or notoriety within the movement. The fact that someone may “have done good work in the past” is never a valid excuse to tolerate damaging participation in the present. The movement must be about truth and justice rather than character and popularity.

In Summary: It is in our experience that group unity is not achieved by ignoring divisiveness. It is achieved through civil critique and a constructive response to the disruptive behavior.


Divisive Issues

1. Debunked Theories

We recognize an important distinction between private speculation and public promotion. Speculation, hypothesis, and experimentation are the basis of the scientific method. However, the promotion of highly speculative claims is irresponsible and damaging to our credibility. Instead, verifiable fact-based research must be primary in our search for and promotion of the truth. For these reasons we do not support the promotion or debate of the following during activism or blogging:

1. No planes hit the WTC towers
2. Directed Energy Weapons were used to demolish the towers
3. Theories based on inconclusive video and photographic evidence


2. Off Topic Associations

Some associations that are damaging and marginalizing to the movement are listed below. It is a historical fact that the mere mention of these topics has been seen to cause us long term damage. Consequently it is considered by TruthAction.org that only a clear focus on 9/11 fact based evidence will achieve our goals.

1. UFO and alien theories
2. Holocaust revisionism
3. Religion based conspiracy theories
4. Moon landing hoax

Note: It is often a method of the media to bait us on various conspiracy theories in an attempt to discredit us. We suggest any questions on unrelated subjects should not be responded to; rather we should redirect the conversation back to the hard evidence regarding 9/11. This approach is also appropriate with the public.

3. What hit the Pentagon?

The question of "what hit the pentagon" has been the single most divisive issue within the movement, but we can all agree that absolutely nothing could have hit the Pentagon without those in charge allowing it to happen. While we support ongoing research into the event, we urge unity on our common ground; refocusing energy towards demanding accountability and away from endless debate. We urge framing our public presentation of the Pentagon issue around unanimously agreed upon issues such as the absent air defense, the missing 2.3 trillion dollars, the conflicting testimonies, the inconsistencies regarding the official flight path of AA77, the very low probability of an amateur pilot achieving the maneuver seen and the refusal by government agencies to release evidence.

4. Global Warming

It has become apparent during attempts to reach out to environmentalists in our communities that questioning the veracity of man made global warming has prevented many in this group from continuing dialog with us. We suggest these “off topic” assertions or debates should not be brought to the public domain during 9/11 truth outreach. truthaction.org as a group holds no particular view on this issue.

Conclusion

Many activists came together to make these recommendations possible. We have all had direct experience with behavior and information that has impeded our cause. Thus we hope this document will help the 9/11 truth movement to achieve greater unity and focus. We encourage activists to cite and link to these recommendations as a standard response to diversionary and disruptive behavior. Hopefully, this will allow us to move beyond some of our major obstacles to spreading truth and securing justice.



These recommendations were inspired by and contain large portions of the TruthMove Declaration 2008.
Thank you to TruthMove and the other activists who contributed to this document.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Stolen Poem

Nicolas posted this at Truthaction--dead funny:


I dreamed I saw Osama last night,
alive as you and me.
Says I, "But Osama, we know your dead"
"Fuck you. I'm on TV,
Fox News, I'm on TV."

"Didn't your kidneys finally give out?"
"No, and in fact, I'm feeling spry
As long as George and Dick need me,
No way I'll ever die.
George and Dick won't let me die"

"Back in the mountains, Osama," says I,
"you must think that I'm a rube,"
"Nope, got you there," Osama says
"You see I'm on YouTube.
That's me on ol YouTube."

And standing there as big as life
Thin, fat, and Hairclubbed for Men
Fifty Osamas all sang out
"We'll come back again and again.
We'll come back again and again"

From Bohemian Grove to Bilderberg,
When spymasters need a lie,
To make us piss right in our pants
They'll just trot out that guy.
They'll just trot out that guy.

I dreamed I saw Osama last night,
alive as you and me.
Says I "Osama, we know your dead"
"Fox News. I'm on TV."
"YouTube, I'm on TV."

LMAO.

Right--more serious stuff coming soon.

Friday, March 7, 2008

Surprisingly, Genghis is a nice bloke--mostly

Additional: there seems to be a bit of traffic from a sad creepy blog. This link may help new readers keep things in context:

click link for your information

Additional ends.


Well, when he wants to be, I'm sure.

I've heard some dodgy things about his past with Ricky, but who doesn't have a past? I bring this up because the dear contacted me for help with this and that, you know, stuff.

He could be a bit dishy -- this pic probably doesn't do him justice.

Well, good luck to you luv--cheers for the nice chat. Hope you find what you're seeking--and eventually snap out of the no planes rubbish. ;-)

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

To whom it may concern...

Well, if our Pat can post "jokes" about torture and murder directed at 911 activists, I sure as bloodly hell can post this:



From my channel:

About This Video
A message to those who know who they are.

Me and mine have managed to "make some people angry"-- people placed highly who make it their business to attack anti-war activists. We have a bit of a problem with that--and feel the need to share it with the 'Verse when necessary:

How we broke the Kennebunkport Hoax Story

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/...

They--who include some LaRouchites-- may be wondering if we're planning to give up anytime soon--this should answer that wee question.

"Shoot us in the back" all you want--it won't stop us.

And because I know their puppets find it particularly aggravating, all comments and ratings have been disabled.

Everyone else, just enjoy the show. ;-)

Cheers to JAT for getting this clip!

Screw Lucy crosses the line--again

And this time it's the "debunkers" saying so. Don't see that much--usually we have to drag them kicking and screaming--but I digress.

In this charming post our Pat says secret prisons are too good for 911 activists:

Tuesday, March 04, 2008

Secret Prisons Are Too Good For Them



A commenter on Joe Scarborough suggests putting 9-11 Truthers in secret prisons in Eastern Europe. Too expensive and inefficient; I suggest that the Secret Service bring Chinese-made guillotines to every Clinton event. We'd see an end to all this nonsense in about ten seconds.

Mind, "secret prison" is an euphemism for gulags where torture, rape and murder are par for the course.

So, just to be clear, Pat:

A: you do admit there are secret prisons
B: you think they serve a fine purpose
C: you think torture, rape and murder is okay for people who disagree with you about 911.
D: or maybe just murder--you seem to have a guillotine fixation

Glad we got that sorted.

Mind, considering the Larouche tactics Screw Lucy happily embraced last fall this should come as no surprise. But it does--even to Pat's fan base. As one can see, among the usual idiotic comments, there is some sanity:

Only a matter of time before a 9/11truther goes nuts and takes a shot at somebody.


I suppose it hasn't occurred to any of those 9/11 idiots that the Secret Service is armed with more than tasers.


Gravatar


Pat,
I know this was just an attempt at humor, but I'd say this was a poor attempt. While I am not familiar with Chinese guilliotines as they were mostly a French-made device (though Germans used them too for a time), I get the point. I think, realistically, serious repression of the 9/11 truth movement may be that proverbial straw that breaks that proverbial camel's back - in short, it may cause things to get ugly real fast. And personally I'd rather we sort this all out in the least ugly way possible.


Gravatar Boris, Justin, Jon, Brian, and Billy could get nice tans down in Guantanamo.

I hear they got plenty of room down there these days...


Gravatar Ugly?

Fast?

How about this?

Boris/koni , Justin, Jon, Brian, and Billy could get nice tans down in Guantanamo.

I hear they got plenty of room down there these days...


Gravatar Sorry about the dupe about the dupes.


Gravatar And why, do you suppose, hasn't this happened yet, Koni?


Gravatar Boris, if I remember correctly the Chinese guillotine remark is a reference to a twoofer claim that the said guilotines were being imported for use in FEMA death camps. Needless to say, the claim turned out to be a load of old nonsense.


Gravatar Well, of course, this is a joke on Pat's part. But here is another perspective - speaking as someone who continues to have close encounters with these truthdouches, it is very clear to me that many of them would love to imprison/kill/both anyone who disagrees with them. Not just the 1000's who participated in the putative inside job, but anyone who sheds light on the infantilism and bad logic of their bullshit claims.

This is fantastic nonsense of course, because the only public position any of these douches will ever acquire (now that batshit McKinney is out of office) is perhaps a guest spot on any future batshit Rosie O'Donnell talk show.


This post was over the line. If you truly believe in free speech, you support the speech that is most disgusting to you. If you only support "free" speech that makes you happy, you have no concept of free society.


ps: I'm NOT a Troofer.




And here's a screenshot for posterity:




Now there will be some who will protest "But it was all a joke". But we all know that if a 911 activist said anything like this Screw Lucy would be screaming bloody murder.

No double standards for debunkers here. Chew on that, sunbeam.