Thursday, July 24, 2008

The Dark Knight: review - SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!!!

http://www.reelmovienews.com/images/gallery/batman-the-joker_333x500.jpg

Not that I plan to reveal loads of the plot, mind--I just want to speak freely when I get to that bit. FWIW: 4 out of 5 stars.

A couple of days ago I was able to catch a matinée(that is, first and cheap) of the new Batman movie, The Dark Knight. I've been bats about Bats for ages, but the movie poster seemed to make this urgent as some seemed to think the movie might be used as a medium for 911 disinformation. This turns out to be true, but very, very subtly.

Briefly, before I get to the spoiling bits, Heath Ledger makes a brilliant and believable Joker, Aaron Eckhart makes an adequate Two-Face, though the makeup was a bit extreme IMHO, and Christopher Nolan is fine as Bats, contrary to whinging reviewers . I think their real dissatisfaction with the movie comes not from Nolan, but the pacing, which is more like a political action thriller than a superhero film. A superhero film--at least a good one-- usually has a "soaring" feel to it, leaving you light and breathless at the end, with a residual exhilaration. The Spiderman films did this, as did the first two X-men movies ; so did "Batman Begins". But "The Dark Knight" is going back to its darker roots and others have noticed, suggesting it may be too dark. Well, buckle up--that was the real Batman before the comics code almost destroyed him.

Right, last chance to AVOID SPOILERS-BEGINNING NOW.

In the beginning we learn some citizens of Gotham are inspired to dress up as Bats and go out and do their bit to fight crime. Luckily for them they're saved by the real deal who's a bit of an arsehole about it. When they ask the very good question what makes them different, Bats basically tells them they're amateurs. True, but still--Gotta give em credit for stones.

We also see a gang in clown masks--not to difficult to see where this is going--robbing a bank. And not just any bank, a mob owned bank. You'd have to be crazy, right? Nuts! And so you would:

Enter the Joker.

I think Ledger's Joke is THE BEST--like EVER. I believe not only the character is real but he is really crazy. And, to take a psych detour, NOT a sociopath.

I hear the objections all the way from here. Most people don't understand what a sociopath(some interchange psychopath) is: it is a person without empathy. Practically this means they cannot feel anything but their own desire for control and domination. Most are not criminals, but effectively they have no conscience. They really don't care about anything larger than themselves. And sociopaths are sane, very sane--that is, they are aware of objective reality--they just think they are the only important person in the world.

The Joker does not behave like a sociopath. He cares what people think--in a twisted bizarre way. At the same time he has no emotional investment in controlling others. And he is quite insane. The Joker fits the profile of a malignant narcissist(to be fair from a practical, public safety standpoint, a malignant narcissist may be indistinguishable from a criminal sociopath), someone destroyed by life( you cannot get this insane by chance or chemical imbalance) and who has decided everyone else needs to experience his insanity, which is the only real reality. A sociopath would not care what other people think.

But don't ask the Joker why he does what he does--his origin story changes depending who he's holding a knife to. He's probably long forgotten himself.

Back to the story. Needless to say the mob and it's various allies are not happy and meet to discuss this problem, a meeting crashed by--the Joker. Who does this great magic trick--but I'll let you experience the hilarity.

This Joker is not a joke. He is not a cartoon villain. He is seriously dangerous and the film is very good at showing how he applies his brilliance to cover all the angles.

Harvey Dent, soon to be Two-Face, not to dis the role, is not as inspired. That could have been planned--goody two-shoes, do gooder goes bad on one side, nutty nutso on the other. And, after Dent becomes Two-Face, it does give the nutters something of a conversation piece.

The main gist of the plot is the Joker cavorting around town being insane, robbing places, blowing things up, with a spot of murder here and there, whilst the virtuous and doomed DA tries to "clean this town up" with the help of Gordon and Batman.

Now the disinformation bits.

There is much bluster about not "giving in to the terrorist"--meaning the Joker. This part of the plot was handled clumsily. In real life cops do not refer to these people as "terrorists", nor do city officials consider acting--or speaking--as boneheaded as Bush and Co.

There is also a part where the Joker brags about his simple pleasures--among them gasoline and matches, which he is supposed to have used to bring down a multi story hospital. Riiight. Sure, guv. Now show me what's in your other hand--and they do, showing the nearly flat pile of debris from the building's collapse. Just from gasoline. Uh-huh.

On the plus side Morgan Freeman's character makes a point about power and privacy, resigning in protest when Wayne hijacks every cell phone in the city to make a radar network(don't ask--its magic).

Also, during a morally tense moment--unrealistically played(the guards would have just shot him), but whatever--a presumed convict makes a moral decision that destroys stereotypes.

And also on the plus side--the girl dies. Sorry, but that plot bit was DOA dead weight anyway. It there's going to be a girl, it should be Batgirl--or Catwoman. This is a geek movie, not bleeding Jane Austen.

My personal notes--

Some people complain about the editing, but I like it, especially during fight scenes. Like real fights, you can't see all what's going on at one time, but you act anyway, trusting your training. It looks messy and confused, but works--just like in reality.

The end is somber, but that's appropriate all things considered. You want a candy coated, feel good, superhero flick, go rent Superman. This is Batman, The Dark Knight. And we hope for many more.

End note: to whom it may concern:

A quote reminded me of you and your lot-

"Some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.''
The image “http://www.reelmovienews.com/images/gallery/let-it-burn.png” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.


Message received.

Jenny Sparks at OpEd News

Someone must be really irritated out there...

It seems I have a fan, Better World Order, at OEN republishing some of my greatest hits, one of which made it to the mainline headline(second row, far right):




Innit that sweet? And I was wondering why blog traffic exploded in the last week.

Cheers, luv!

I suppose this means I should finish up works in progress--well, when I've kicked this cold.

Cheers again to Better World Order and welcome all my new readers. ;-)

(Sorry about the lack of comments--see, it irritates the trolls to no end NOT to be able to respond. That right there is worth its weight in gold in laughs)

To whom it may concern: what a little birdy told me....

Seems your lot have got a radio slot Friday with a right prat. How exciting! I suppose we get to see how much you think you're are protected.

Well, have fun being public figures, but remember your education:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/16695#comment-192870


A public figure is someone who has chosen to make their identity public, either by publishing their information or agreeing to be interviewed on telly or by a newspaper. At that point one may republish that identification within reason. This does not however include their address or phone number, unless of course they have given permission to publish this.

Everyone else is a private person and publishing their person information without their consent is invasion of privacy, and the party(s) involved maybe be held legally liable for any damages that may result. And the longer such information or suspected information remains public, the less likely feigning ignorance will protect the offender once the hammer does fall.

Jennifer Wynhausen is a public figure; she has chosen to be interviewed on television, as this video at this link shows:

http://www.katu.com/news/10130686.html
(click on the video link under Julia Silverman's name--this video was brought to my attention by an individual who was able to prove by comparing email headers that 911stalker was Jennifer, not Nico.)

Originally posted at aayers blog:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/11755


Behave, and more reminders will not be necessary.

This is what happens when you conspire to make me and my mates believe we are targets of death threats--we take you as seriously as death. And act accordingly.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Bohemian Grove 2008 Guest List--courtesy of Truthaction!

Just remember--the conspiracy is BORING--a bunch of rich bastards getting together to see how much richer they can get. No sacrifices, robes or owls need apply.


Click here to download pdf.

Friday, July 18, 2008

Ottawa Rocks!

Sunday, July 6, 2008

The Final Mystery Of 9/11?

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Social Engineering, Activism, and the Mighty Wurlitzer--the prelude or Part 0

Been promising my mates to blog about this soon, but, for a 342p book it's dead dense. I feel the need to do supplemental research every chapter. Needless to say it's been slow going.

But the end is in sight. If you haven't read the Mighty Wurlitzer yet take the time if you can. The New York Times has good review:

There were indeed fronts directly established by the C.I.A. for a particular
goal, and the story Wilford tells of them in “The Mighty Wurlitzer” is
fascinating, involving a surprising collection of well-known figures in American
life. Consider the Independent Service for Information, set up at Harvard
specifically for the purpose of getting some young anti-Communist Americans to
attend a huge youth festival being organized by the Communists in Vienna in
1959. This was one of a series of events in which the Soviet Union promoted its
versions of peace and progress, as contrasted with the cold-war policies of the
capitalist United States.

Stay tuned...